Photo AI
Question 29
Justify the continued use of the Arrhenius definition of acids and bases, despite the development of the more sophisticated Brönsted–Lowry definition. Why does the ... show full transcript
Step 1
Answer
The continued use of the Arrhenius definition can be justified for several reasons:
Simplicity and Accessibility: The Arrhenius definition is straightforward and easy to understand, making it a useful starting point for those new to the study of acids and bases. This simplicity aids in teaching foundational concepts in chemistry.
Historical Context: The Arrhenius definition laid the groundwork for the study of acid-base chemistry. Its historical significance means it remains in use for basic applications and educational contexts, providing context for more advanced theories like the Brönsted–Lowry definition.
Applicability in Certain Reactions: Many reactions, especially in a high school chemistry context, can be adequately explained using the Arrhenius definitions. For example, the dissociation of strong acids and bases in aqueous solutions can often be effectively understood through this model, providing students with practical insight.
Thus, while the Brönsted–Lowry definition offers a broader perspective on acid-base behavior, the Arrhenius definition remains valid in specific situations.
Step 2
Answer
The neutralisation of strong acids and bases is generally an exothermic reaction, releasing a consistent amount of heat. This heat release, approximately -57 kJ mol⁻¹, arises from the formation of water from hydronium ions (H₃O⁺) from the acid and hydroxide ions (OH⁻) from the base. The reaction can be represented as follows:
This reaction is highly favorable, leading to a consistent heat release across various strong acids and bases due to the strong interaction in the resultant water molecule, along with the dissolution of salts formed during neutralisation.
Report Improved Results
Recommend to friends
Students Supported
Questions answered