Kim has been found guilty of drink driving - HSC - SSCE Legal Studies - Question 12 - 2019 - Paper 1
Question 12
Kim has been found guilty of drink driving.
What did the prosecution prove?
A. Kim was the person driving the vehicle.
B. Kim knew her blood alcohol concentration w... show full transcript
Worked Solution & Example Answer:Kim has been found guilty of drink driving - HSC - SSCE Legal Studies - Question 12 - 2019 - Paper 1
Step 1
A. Kim was the person driving the vehicle.
96%
114 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
While this statement may be true, it does not sufficiently prove the prosecution's case regarding the legality of her blood alcohol concentration.
Step 2
B. Kim knew her blood alcohol concentration was above the legal limit.
99%
104 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
This statement alone does not address whether she was driving the vehicle, which is a key element of the prosecution's case.
Step 3
C. Kim was the person driving the vehicle and her blood alcohol concentration was above the legal limit.
96%
101 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
This is a strong statement that directly answers what the prosecution needed to prove, as it confirms both actions: driving and being above the legal limit.
Step 4
D. Kim was the person driving the vehicle and she knew her blood alcohol concentration was above the legal limit.
98%
120 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
This statement adds the element of knowledge, but it is not necessary for the basic prosecution to establish its case.
