Photo AI
Question 5
What is Jordan’s involvement in this situation? A. He is the principal offender. B. He has not committed a crime. C. He is an accessory after the fact. D. He has... show full transcript
Step 1
Answer
To determine Jordan's involvement, we must analyze the given options based on legal definitions:
Principal Offender: This refers to someone who directly commits a crime. To choose this option, evidence must show that Jordan was the one who performed the illegal act.
Has Not Committed a Crime: This option suggests Jordan had no role in the crime at all. If there is proof of his involvement, this would not be correct.
Accessory After the Fact: An accessory after the fact is someone who assists another knowing that they have committed a felony. This option applies if Jordan helped someone evade arrest or conceal the crime.
Preliminary Crime: Engaging in preparatory acts for a crime but not actually committing it. This option holds if Jordan had intent and actions leading toward a crime without completing it.
After analyzing all options, the correct answer is D: 'He has committed a preliminary crime.' This conclusion is drawn based on the assumption that Jordan acted in preparation for a crime which did not culminate in an execution.
Report Improved Results
Recommend to friends
Students Supported
Questions answered