Mary was found to be an accessory before the fact in a bank robbery - HSC - SSCE Legal Studies - Question 8 - 2018 - Paper 1
Question 8
Mary was found to be an accessory before the fact in a bank robbery.
Which of the following would have led to this finding?
A. Mary supplied the gun that was used.... show full transcript
Worked Solution & Example Answer:Mary was found to be an accessory before the fact in a bank robbery - HSC - SSCE Legal Studies - Question 8 - 2018 - Paper 1
Step 1
A. Mary supplied the gun that was used.
96%
114 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
Supplying the gun indicates a premeditated involvement in the robbery, as it shows that Mary provided the means to commit the crime. This action qualifies her as an accessory before the fact, as she contributed to the crime's planning.
Step 2
B. Mary used the gun at the crime scene.
99%
104 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
Using the gun at the crime scene suggests direct involvement in the robbery. However, being an accessory before the fact implies that one is involved in planning rather than directly participating in the crime itself, so this would not fit the description.
Step 3
C. Mary carried the money out of the bank.
96%
101 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
Carrying the money would indicate Mary was actively involved in the robbery itself, which does not align with the definition of being an accessory before the fact.
Step 4
D. Mary hid the money taken from the bank.
98%
120 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
Hiding the money implies post-crime involvement rather than being an accessory before the fact, as this action takes place after the robbery has occurred.
