Why could Kim and Ashley be charged with a strict liability offence?
(A) They had purchased the spray paint cans
(B) They had the intention to use the spray paint cans
(C) They had no proof of purchase for the spray paint cans
(D) They had possession of the spray paint cans on the train - HSC - SSCE Legal Studies - Question 18 - 2012 - Paper 1
Question 18
Why could Kim and Ashley be charged with a strict liability offence?
(A) They had purchased the spray paint cans
(B) They had the intention to use the spray paint ... show full transcript
Worked Solution & Example Answer:Why could Kim and Ashley be charged with a strict liability offence?
(A) They had purchased the spray paint cans
(B) They had the intention to use the spray paint cans
(C) They had no proof of purchase for the spray paint cans
(D) They had possession of the spray paint cans on the train - HSC - SSCE Legal Studies - Question 18 - 2012 - Paper 1
Step 1
They had purchased the spray paint cans
96%
114 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
This option is incorrect because merely purchasing the spray paint cans does not constitute a strict liability offence.
Step 2
They had the intention to use the spray paint cans
99%
104 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
Having the intention to use the spray paint cans does not directly relate to a strict liability offence, as it requires demonstrable wrongdoing.
Step 3
They had no proof of purchase for the spray paint cans
96%
101 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
While lacking proof of purchase is notable, it does not specifically indicate a strict liability offence.
Step 4
They had possession of the spray paint cans on the train
98%
120 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
This option correctly identifies a situation that can lead to a strict liability offence, as possessing the spray paint cans in a restricted area can result in legal consequences regardless of intent or knowledge.
