Which best describes how a criminal case must be proved?
(A) By the defendant, beyond reasonable doubt
(B) By the prosecution, beyond reasonable doubt
(C) By the plaintiff, on the balance of probabilities
(D) By the prosecution, on the balance of probabilities - HSC - SSCE Legal Studies - Question 2 - 2007 - Paper 1
Question 2
Which best describes how a criminal case must be proved?
(A) By the defendant, beyond reasonable doubt
(B) By the prosecution, beyond reasonable doubt
(C) By the pla... show full transcript
Worked Solution & Example Answer:Which best describes how a criminal case must be proved?
(A) By the defendant, beyond reasonable doubt
(B) By the prosecution, beyond reasonable doubt
(C) By the plaintiff, on the balance of probabilities
(D) By the prosecution, on the balance of probabilities - HSC - SSCE Legal Studies - Question 2 - 2007 - Paper 1
Step 1
By the defendant, beyond reasonable doubt
96%
114 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
This option is incorrect because it is not the defendant who must prove the case; rather, it's the role of the prosecution to provide evidence.
Step 2
By the prosecution, beyond reasonable doubt
99%
104 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
This is the correct answer. In a criminal case, the prosecution must prove the defendant's guilt beyond reasonable doubt, ensuring a high standard of proof to protect the accused.
Step 3
By the plaintiff, on the balance of probabilities
96%
101 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
This option is incorrect. The term 'plaintiff' is typically used in civil cases, not criminal cases.
Step 4
By the prosecution, on the balance of probabilities
98%
120 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
This option is also incorrect. The standard of proof in criminal cases is beyond reasonable doubt, not the balance of probabilities, which is used in civil cases.
