Photo AI
Question 8
The Supreme Court is hearing a criminal case. At the conclusion of the third day, two jurors visit the crime scene. They discuss the defendant’s evidence and then en... show full transcript
Step 1
Answer
This scenario illustrates a potential problem concerning the jury process. Jurors are expected to remain impartial and rely solely on the evidence presented during the trial. When they leave the courtroom to discuss the case outside of the formal setting or attempt to influence each other's opinions, it compromises their role in the judicial process. In this case, the act of two jurors discussing evidence outside the courtroom and encouraging a guilty stance collectively exemplifies 'a denial of justice.' Hence, the correct answer is (B) A denial of justice.
Report Improved Results
Recommend to friends
Students Supported
Questions answered