Why are non-legal measures often more effective than legal measures in addressing human rights issues?
(A) Because of the operation of state sovereignty
(B) Because collective human rights override individual human rights
(C) Because non-legal measures can always be adapted to individual circumstances
(D) Because non-legal measures can bypass government processes and bureaucracies - HSC - SSCE Legal Studies - Question 9 - 2004 - Paper 1
Question 9
Why are non-legal measures often more effective than legal measures in addressing human rights issues?
(A) Because of the operation of state sovereignty
(B) Because ... show full transcript
Worked Solution & Example Answer:Why are non-legal measures often more effective than legal measures in addressing human rights issues?
(A) Because of the operation of state sovereignty
(B) Because collective human rights override individual human rights
(C) Because non-legal measures can always be adapted to individual circumstances
(D) Because non-legal measures can bypass government processes and bureaucracies - HSC - SSCE Legal Studies - Question 9 - 2004 - Paper 1
Step 1
Because non-legal measures can bypass government processes and bureaucracies
96%
114 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
Non-legal measures often offer a more direct approach to addressing human rights issues by circumventing lengthy government processes that can delay justice. Unlike legal measures, which may be bogged down by bureaucratic red tape, non-legal measures can mobilize community action, create awareness, and apply pressure more swiftly and effectively. This agility allows for immediate responses to urgent human rights violations, making non-legal measures a vital tool for advocates in addressing human rights issues in real-time.