3. (a) (i) Sketch the graph of $y = |2x - 1|$ - HSC - SSCE Mathematics Extension 1 - Question 3 - 2008 - Paper 1
Question 3
3. (a) (i) Sketch the graph of $y = |2x - 1|$.
(ii) Hence, or otherwise, solve the inequality $|2x - 1| \leq |x - 3|$.
(b) Use mathematical induction to prove that... show full transcript
Worked Solution & Example Answer:3. (a) (i) Sketch the graph of $y = |2x - 1|$ - HSC - SSCE Mathematics Extension 1 - Question 3 - 2008 - Paper 1
Step 1
Sketch the graph of $y = |2x - 1|$
96%
114 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
To sketch the graph of the function y=∣2x−1∣, we need to consider the absolute value behavior,
which will change based on the value of x.
Identify the x-intercept by solving 2x−1=0, leading to x=21.
For x<21, the expression inside the absolute value is negative, thus y=−(2x−1)=−2x+1.
This segment of the graph is a line with a negative slope.
For x≥21, the expression is non-negative, leading to y=2x−1.
This segment of the graph has a positive slope.
Plot the two linear segments on the graph to complete the sketch, with a V-shape at the point (21,0).
Step 2
Hence, or otherwise, solve the inequality $|2x - 1| \leq |x - 3|$
99%
104 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
To solve the inequality ∣2x−1∣≤∣x−3∣, we break it into cases based on the critical points encountered in both absolute values:
Determine the critical points: 2x−1=0 gives x=21,
and x−3=0 gives x=3. Thus, we analyze intervals determined by these points: ((-\infty, \frac{1}{2}),[\frac{1}{2}, 3],and(3, \infty)$.
Interval 1: For x<21,
The inequality to solve is −(2x−1)≤−(x−3) which simplifies to 2x−1≥x−3 leading to x≥−2.
Interval 2: For x∈[21,3],
Here, 2x−1≤x−3 gives x≤−2. This interval yields no solutions.
Interval 3: For x>3,
We have 2x−1≤2x−6, leading to 1≤−6, which is false.
The results yield a non-overlapping region suggesting x∈[−2,21]. Thus, the solution to the inequality is x∈[−2,21].
Step 3
Use mathematical induction to prove that, for integers $n \geq 1$
96%
101 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
To prove the equation 1×3+2×4+3×5+⋯+n(n+2)=6n(n+1)(2n+7) by induction:
Base case: For n=1, we check:
LHS = 1×3=3 and RHS = 61(2)(9)=3, thus both sides are equal.
Inductive Step: Assume for n=k, the equation holds:
1×3+2×4+…+k(k+2)=6k(k+1)(2k+7)
We need to show it holds for n=k+1:
LHS = 1×3+2×4+…+k(k+2)+(k+1)(k+3)
Substituting the inductive hypothesis:
=6k(k+1)(2k+7)+(k+1)(k+3)
Combine like terms to manipulate the expression, factor out (k+1).
After simplification, show that it equals the RHS for n=k+1. This completes the proof.
Step 4
Show that $\frac{d\theta}{dt} = \frac{v}{\ell^2 + x^2}$
98%
120 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
To demonstrate that dtdθ=ℓ2+x2v, apply the following:
Using the relationship of the triangle formed, we know that:
tan(θ)=ℓx
Taking the derivative with respect to time t yields:
sec2(θ)dtdθ=ℓ1dtdx=ℓv
Given that sec2(θ)=1+tan2(θ)=1+ℓ2x2,
substitute this in to get:
dtdθ=ℓsec2(θ)v=ℓv⋅ℓ2+x2ℓ2
Simplifying this gives the required expression, dtdθ=ℓ2+x2v.
Step 5
Let $m$ be the maximum value of $\frac{d\theta}{dt}$.
97%
117 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
To determine the maximum value m of dtdθ, first note:
The derived formula is dtdθ=ℓ2+x2v. The maximum occurs when x is minimized.
The minimum value of x happens when the race car is closest to O, ideally at x=0. Thus:
m=ℓ2+02v=ℓ2v
Therefore, we conclude that m=ℓ2v.
Step 6
Find the two values of $\theta$ for which $\frac{d\theta}{dt} = \frac{m}{4}$
97%
121 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
To find the two values of θ such that dtdθ=4m:
Substitute m into the equation:
ℓ2+x2v=41ℓ2v
This leads to:
ℓ2+x2=4ℓ2
implying that x2=3ℓ2, hence:
x=3ℓ
and condition can yield x=−3ℓ when considering symmetry.
Using the aforementioned x in tan(θ)=ℓx gives:
tan(θ)=13⇒θ=3π
which also gives tan(θ)=−13 yielding:
θ=−3π.