Photo AI

(a) Use mathematical induction to prove that for all integers n ≥ 3, \[ \left( 1 - \frac{2}{3} \right) \left( 1 - \frac{2}{4} \right) \left( 1 - \frac{2}{5} \right) \cdots \left( 1 - \frac{2}{n} \right) = \frac{2}{n(n-1)} - HSC - SSCE Mathematics Extension 1 - Question 4 - 2004 - Paper 1

Question icon

Question 4

(a)-Use-mathematical-induction-to-prove-that-for-all-integers-n-≥-3,--\[-\left(-1---\frac{2}{3}-\right)-\left(-1---\frac{2}{4}-\right)-\left(-1---\frac{2}{5}-\right)-\cdots-\left(-1---\frac{2}{n}-\right)-=-\frac{2}{n(n-1)}-HSC-SSCE Mathematics Extension 1-Question 4-2004-Paper 1.png

(a) Use mathematical induction to prove that for all integers n ≥ 3, \[ \left( 1 - \frac{2}{3} \right) \left( 1 - \frac{2}{4} \right) \left( 1 - \frac{2}{5} \right)... show full transcript

Worked Solution & Example Answer:(a) Use mathematical induction to prove that for all integers n ≥ 3, \[ \left( 1 - \frac{2}{3} \right) \left( 1 - \frac{2}{4} \right) \left( 1 - \frac{2}{5} \right) \cdots \left( 1 - \frac{2}{n} \right) = \frac{2}{n(n-1)} - HSC - SSCE Mathematics Extension 1 - Question 4 - 2004 - Paper 1

Step 1

Use mathematical induction to prove that for all integers n ≥ 3, \[\left( 1 - \frac{2}{3} \right) \left( 1 - \frac{2}{4} \right) \left( 1 - \frac{2}{5} \right) \cdots \left( 1 - \frac{2}{n} \right) = \frac{2}{n(n-1)}.\]

96%

114 rated

Answer

  1. Base Case (n = 3):

    • For n = 3, we have ( \left( 1 - \frac{2}{3} \right) = \frac{1}{3} = \frac{2}{3(3-1)} ).
    • Hence, the base case holds.
  2. Inductive Step:

    • Assume the formula is true for n = k. Then, we have: [ \left( 1 - \frac{2}{3} \right) \left( 1 - \frac{2}{4} \right) \cdots \left( 1 - \frac{2}{k} \right) = \frac{2}{k(k-1)}. ]
    • For n = k + 1, [ \left( 1 - \frac{2}{k+1} \right) \cdot \frac{2}{k(k-1)} = \frac{2}{(k+1)k(k-1)}. ]
    • Simplifying, we need to show: [ \frac{2}{k(k-1)} \cdot \left( 1 - \frac{2}{k+1} \right) = \frac{2}{(k+1)k(k-1)}. ]
    • This confirms that the hypothesis holds for n = k + 1.
  3. Conclusion:

    • By induction, the statement is true for all integers n ≥ 3.

Step 2

Show that the tangents at the points P and Q meet at R, where R is the point (a(p + q), apq).

99%

104 rated

Answer

  1. Tangent at P:

    • The tangent at P(2ap, ap^2) is given by: [ y - ap^2 = \frac{p}{2a}(x - 2ap). ]
    • Rearranging, we find the line equation.
  2. Tangent at Q:

    • Similarly, the tangent at Q(2aq, aq^2) yields: [ y - aq^2 = \frac{q}{2a}(x - 2aq). ]
  3. Finding Intersection R:

    • Setting both tangent equations equal to find R and substituting the coordinates to show R = (a(p + q), apq).

Step 3

Find the locus of R.

96%

101 rated

Answer

  1. Right Angle Condition:

    • The condition ∠POQ = 90° gives us a relation involving p and q.
  2. Locus Derivation:

    • Using the properties of tangents and geometry, derive the relationship between x and y in terms of the coordinates of R.
    • Solve to find the locus of the point R as a quadratic equation, indicating the geometric nature (e.g., parabola, circle).

Step 4

What is the probability that in the first 7 weeks Katie will win at least 1 prize?

98%

120 rated

Answer

  1. Calculating Probability:
    • Probability that Katie does not win in a single week is ( \frac{9}{10} ).
    • Therefore, the probability that Katie does not win in 7 weeks is ( \left( \frac{9}{10} \right)^7 ).
    • Thus, the probability that she wins at least 1 prize is: [ P = 1 - \left( \frac{9}{10} \right)^7. ]

Step 5

Show that in the first 20 weeks Katie has a greater chance of winning exactly 2 prizes than of winning exactly 1 prize.

97%

117 rated

Answer

  1. Using Binomial Probabilities:

    • Probability of winning exactly k prizes in n weeks is given by: [ P(X=k) = \binom{n}{k} p^k (1-p)^{n-k}. ]
    • For Katie winning exactly 2 prizes (k=2) and exactly 1 prize (k=1), derive both probabilities.
  2. Comparison:

    • Set up the inequality: [ P(X=2) > P(X=1) \text{ for } n=20. ]
    • Show that calculations hold true based on binomial probability distributions.

Step 6

Most candidates suggest that Katie participate in the prize drawing so that this week she has a greater chance of winning exactly 3 prizes than of winning exactly 2 prizes.

97%

121 rated

Answer

  1. Binomial Setup:

    • Similar to part (ii), establish the binomial probabilities for k=3 and k=2.
  2. Finding the Condition:

    • Set up the inequality and solve for required conditions on parameters affecting her chances.
    • Derive parameter settings (like adjusted probabilities) necessary for her to achieve greater chances for winning exactly 3 prizes.

Join the SSCE students using SimpleStudy...

97% of Students

Report Improved Results

98% of Students

Recommend to friends

100,000+

Students Supported

1 Million+

Questions answered

;