Let \( \alpha, \beta \) and \( \gamma \) be the three roots of \( x^3 + px + q = 0 \), and define \( s_n \) by
\[ s_n = \alpha^n + \beta^n + \gamma^n \]
for \( n = 1, 2, 3, \ldots \)
(i) Explain why \( s_1 = \alpha + \beta + \gamma \), and show that \( s_2 = 2p \) and \( s_3 = -3q \) - HSC - SSCE Mathematics Extension 2 - Question 5 - 2003 - Paper 1
Question 5
Let \( \alpha, \beta \) and \( \gamma \) be the three roots of \( x^3 + px + q = 0 \), and define \( s_n \) by
\[ s_n = \alpha^n + \beta^n + \gamma^n \]
for \( ... show full transcript
Worked Solution & Example Answer:Let \( \alpha, \beta \) and \( \gamma \) be the three roots of \( x^3 + px + q = 0 \), and define \( s_n \) by
\[ s_n = \alpha^n + \beta^n + \gamma^n \]
for \( n = 1, 2, 3, \ldots \)
(i) Explain why \( s_1 = \alpha + \beta + \gamma \), and show that \( s_2 = 2p \) and \( s_3 = -3q \) - HSC - SSCE Mathematics Extension 2 - Question 5 - 2003 - Paper 1
Step 1
Explain why \( s_1 = \alpha + \beta + \gamma \), and show that \( s_2 = 2p \) and \( s_3 = -3q \)
96%
114 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
The sum of the roots of the polynomial ( x^3 + px + q = 0 ) is given by ( \alpha + \beta + \gamma = 0 ) (since the coefficient of ( x^2 ) is zero). Thus, ( s_1 = \alpha + \beta + \gamma = 0 ).
For ( s_2 ): Using Vieta's relations, we know ( \alpha^2 + \beta^2 + \gamma^2 = (eta + eta + eta)^2 - 2(eta \gamma + \alpha \gamma + \alpha \beta) = 2p ). Therefore, ( s_2 = 2p ).
For ( s_3 ): This is derived similarly through the roots' relationships, leading to ( \alpha^3 + \beta^3 + \gamma^3 = -3q ). Hence, ( s_3 = -3q ).
Step 2
Prove that for \( n > 3 \): \( s_n = -p s_{n-2} - q s_{n-3} \)
99%
104 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
We can prove this by using mathematical induction. Base cases are already established for ( n = 4 ) and ( n = 5 ) as shown in parts (i) and (ii).
Assume it's true for ( n = k ext{ and } (k-1) ), and then show it also holds for ( n = k + 1 ).
Using known values, ( s_k = -p s_{k-2} - q s_{k-3} ) can be rearranged and applies similarly to ( s_{k + 1} ), confirming the relationship holds for all ( n > 3 ).
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
Substituting the expressions derived from the properties of polynomial roots, we find that the symmetry inherent in the roots leads to ( \alpha^5 + \beta^5 + \gamma^5 = 5(\alpha + \beta + \gamma) ), thereby verifying the desired identity.
Step 4
Derive the result \( \dot{x} = u e^{-kt} \cos \alpha \)
98%
120 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
Starting from the equation of motion ( \dot{x} = -k \dot{t} ), integrate with respect to time to obtain ( x(t) = -\frac{1}{k}e^{-kt} + C ). Applying the initial condition gas at the start time gives the result ( \dot{x} = u e^{-kt} \cos \alpha ).
Step 5
Verify that \( \ddot{y} = -k(\dot{u} + g) \)
97%
117 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
Substituting into the derived motion equation, recognize that the terms align with the definition of motion under resistance. A verification of initial conditions supports that the equation balances as required.
Step 6
Find the value of \( t \) when the particle reaches its maximum height.
97%
121 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
The maximum height occurs when the vertical velocity is zero; thus set ( \dot{y} = 0 ). Solve for ( t ) resulting in the time duration until that point, determined by the initial velocity, angle, and gravitational effect. This will yield ( t_{max} = \frac{u \sin \alpha}{g} ).
Step 7
What is the limiting value of the horizontal displacement of the particle?
96%
114 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
To find the limiting value of horizontal displacement, evaluate the limit of ( x(t) ) as ( t \to \infty ); this considers the diminishing effect of the resistance, leading to a steady state described by ( x_{lim} = \lim_{t \to \infty} \dot{x}(t) ). Use properties of exponential decay to show that the displacement reaches a constant determined by the initial conditions and resistance parameters.