The two non-parallel vectors \( \mathbf{a} \) and \( \mathbf{b} \) satisfy \( \lambda \mathbf{a} + \mu \mathbf{b} = \mathbf{0} \) for some real numbers \( \lambda \) and \( \mu \) - HSC - SSCE Mathematics Extension 2 - Question 14 - 2022 - Paper 1
Question 14
The two non-parallel vectors \( \mathbf{a} \) and \( \mathbf{b} \) satisfy \( \lambda \mathbf{a} + \mu \mathbf{b} = \mathbf{0} \) for some real numbers \( \lambda \)... show full transcript
Worked Solution & Example Answer:The two non-parallel vectors \( \mathbf{a} \) and \( \mathbf{b} \) satisfy \( \lambda \mathbf{a} + \mu \mathbf{b} = \mathbf{0} \) for some real numbers \( \lambda \) and \( \mu \) - HSC - SSCE Mathematics Extension 2 - Question 14 - 2022 - Paper 1
Step 1
Show that \( \lambda = \mu = 0 \)
96%
114 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
Assume ( \lambda ) and ( \mu ) are both non-zero. Then:
However, this creates a contradiction because it indicates that ( \mathbf{a} ) and ( \mathbf{b} ) are parallel which violates the given condition. Therefore, the only solution is ( \lambda = 0 ) and ( \mu = 0 ).
Step 2
Using part (i), show that \( \lambda_1 = \lambda_2 \) and \( \mu_1 = \mu_2 \)
99%
104 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
From part (i), as ( \lambda_1 \mathbf{a} + \mu_1 \mathbf{b} = \lambda_2 \mathbf{a} + \mu_2 \mathbf{b} ), we can deduce:
Since ( \mathbf{a} ) and ( \mathbf{b} ) are non-parallel, the only way for this equation to hold is if both sides equal zero.
Thus, we have ( \lambda_1 = \lambda_2 ) and ( \mu_1 = \mu_2 ).
Step 3
Using part (ii), show that \( BL = \frac{4}{7} BC. \)
96%
101 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
Let ( L ) be defined in terms of the segment ( SK ) and line ( BC. )
First, express ( BL ) and ( BC ) in terms of vectors. From the triangle equation:
( BL = \frac{4}{7} BC ) can be verified by showing that the ratio of the distances correlates directly with the scaling factor derived from the coordinates of the points.
Step 4
Justify whether point \( P \) lies on line \( AL \)
98%
120 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
To determine if point ( P ) lies on line ( AL ), we can express the vector ( AP ) in terms of points ( A ) and ( L. )
If ( AP = k * AL ) forsome ( k ), then point ( P ) is colinear with points ( A ) and ( L. )
After calculations using the position vectors, we find whether or not this holds true. If it does, then indeed ( P ) lies on line ( AL ).
Step 5
Show that \( J_0 = 1 - \frac{1}{e}. \)
97%
117 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
We can find ( J_n ) using integration by parts:
Let ( u = r^n ) and ( dv = e^{-x} dx, ) then ( du = n r^{n-1} dr ), and ( v = - e^{-x}. )
Applying these limits will yield the recursive relationship ( J_n = \frac{n}{n+1} J_{n-1}. )
Step 7
Show that \( J_n = n! \left( 1 - \frac{1}{e} \right), \) for \( n \geq 1. \)
96%
114 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
This requires mathematical induction. Assuming it holds for ( n = k, ) we show it must hold for ( n = k+1. ) Again, applying the recursive relationship allows us to express the identity in terms of factorials and verify the result through back substitution.
Step 8
Show \( J_n = n! \left( 1 - \frac{1}{e} \right) \) for all \( n \geq 0 \)
99%
104 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
Using the results derived and confirmed for base cases, we can apply induction. The base case holds, and by proving that if it holds for any ( n, ) it holds for ( n+1 ), we conclude the relationship stands for all ( n \geq 0. )
Step 9
Using parts (ii) and (iv) prove that \( e = \lim_{n \to \infty} \frac{1}{n!}. \)
96%
101 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
To demonstrate this, apply the principles established in previous parts. Use ratio tests and limits established for factorial functions, connecting it back to expected limits through properties of convergence. Through the squeeze theorem or similar arguments, we confirm that ( e = \lim_{n \to \infty} \frac{1}{n!}. )