Photo AI
Question 31
Question 31 — Equity and Health (20 marks) (a) Explain how enabling, mediating and advocating actions can make sustainable improvements for disadvantaged groups. (... show full transcript
Step 1
Answer
To create sustainable improvements for disadvantaged groups, it is essential to employ enabling, mediating, and advocating actions:
Enabling actions empower individuals by enhancing their capacity to improve their own health. This can be done through education and resource provision. For instance, providing workshops that teach disadvantaged groups about nutrition and health awareness empowers them to make informed choices.
Mediating actions involve bringing together different sectors to facilitate collaboration for better health outcomes. This includes health services, community organizations, and government bodies working together to address health disparities. For example, a coalition could form to tackle smoking rates among ATSI communities by collectively implementing educational programs tailored to their cultural context.
Advocacy involves representing the interests and needs of disadvantaged groups to policymakers and the community. By advocating for specific health policies or funding aimed at these groups, organizations can bring attention to critical health issues that may otherwise be overlooked. For example, advocating for improved access to health services in rural areas ensures that these communities have better healthcare facilities and resources at their disposal.
In summary, by integrating enabling, mediating, and advocacy efforts, we can foster an environment where disadvantaged groups can achieve sustainable health improvements.
Step 2
Answer
Government funding for health services in Australia plays a crucial role in addressing various health issues. However, the effectiveness of this funding can be assessed through several factors:
An effective use of government funding addresses the most pressing health issues facing Australians, such as mental health services, preventive care, and chronic disease management. For instance, targeted funding for mental health initiatives has been critical in reducing stigma and improving access to care.
Evaluating government funding also includes examining how well it reaches disadvantaged populations. Programs specifically aimed at Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities demonstrate responsiveness to their unique health challenges. While funding exists, disparities in health outcomes indicate that accessibility remains an issue.
The continuous assessment of funded programs is vital for measuring effectiveness. For example, implementing evaluation mechanisms allows the government to track the impact of health initiatives and make necessary adjustments. This ensures that funding is directed towards the most effective interventions.
The success of government funding often depends on community involvement in the decision-making process. Engaging communities in the development and implementation of health programs fosters trust and ensures that the solutions address their real needs.
In conclusion, while government funding has the potential to significantly improve the health status of Australians, its effectiveness is contingent upon thoughtful allocation, accessibility, ongoing evaluation, and community partnership.
Report Improved Results
Recommend to friends
Students Supported
Questions answered