Photo AI
Which of the following was not integral to the arguments presented by the Aboriginal people in support of traditional land ownership in Wik and Mabo? (A) The Torrens Title system (B) The locations of the totems (C) The Stories of the Dreaming (D) The elders’ customary possession - HSC - SSCE Studies of Religion - Question 4 - 2002 - Paper 1
Question 4
Which of the following was not integral to the arguments presented by the Aboriginal people in support of traditional land ownership in Wik and Mabo? (A) The Torren... show full transcript
Worked Solution & Example Answer:Which of the following was not integral to the arguments presented by the Aboriginal people in support of traditional land ownership in Wik and Mabo? (A) The Torrens Title system (B) The locations of the totems (C) The Stories of the Dreaming (D) The elders’ customary possession - HSC - SSCE Studies of Religion - Question 4 - 2002 - Paper 1
Step 1
Identify which option was not integral
Answer
To determine which option was not integral to the arguments presented by the Aboriginal people in support of traditional land ownership, we need to analyze the relevance of each option:
-
The Torrens Title system: This legal framework is associated with land ownership and title registration, which is not central to the traditional views of land ownership held by Aboriginal peoples.
-
The locations of the totems: This is closely tied to Aboriginal culture and their connection to the land, making it integral to their land ownership arguments.
-
The Stories of the Dreaming: These narratives form the cultural and spiritual backbone of Aboriginal connections to land, thus integral to their claims.
-
The elders’ customary possession: The authority and role of elders in customary law are foundational to traditional land ownership arguments.
Based on this analysis, the answer is (A) The Torrens Title system, as it does not align with the traditional arguments made by Aboriginal people.