Photo AI
Question 10
Which of the following is correct? A. In 1992, the High Court of Australia ruled that native title to land did not exist in 1788. B. The Wik decision determined th... show full transcript
Step 1
Answer
Upon evaluating the options:
Option A: In 1992, the High Court of Australia recognized that native title did exist, effectively ruling against this statement.
Option B: The Wik decision affirmed the coexistence of pastoral leaseholders and Aboriginal title holders, but under specific conditions, thus this is incorrect.
Option C: The Mabo case did not deal specifically with artefacts, so this statement is also incorrect.
Option D: The Native Title Amendment Act 1998 (Cth) indeed empowered states and territories to establish their own processes for native title, making this statement correct.
Therefore, the correct answer is D.
Report Improved Results
Recommend to friends
Students Supported
Questions answered