Charlie: Would you ever accept someone’s theory if it couldn’t be proven logically?
Robin: No - HSC - SSCE Studies of Religion - Question 18 - 2020 - Paper 1
Question 18
Charlie: Would you ever accept someone’s theory if it couldn’t be proven logically?
Robin: No. All statements and theories are meaningless, unless they can be verif... show full transcript
Worked Solution & Example Answer:Charlie: Would you ever accept someone’s theory if it couldn’t be proven logically?
Robin: No - HSC - SSCE Studies of Religion - Question 18 - 2020 - Paper 1
Step 1
How would Charlie and Robin best be described?
96%
114 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
In analyzing Charlie and Robin's perspectives:
Charlie presents ideas that align more closely with humanism. He believes in the meaning of propositions, even if they cannot be logically proven, suggesting a focus on human experience and values that transcend empirical evidence.
Robin, on the other hand, strictly adheres to logical reasoning and empirical verification, indicating an atheistic perspective that negates claims without evidence.
Thus, the most fitting description based on their dialogue is: A. Charlie is a humanist and Robin is an atheist.