Photo AI
Charlie: Would you ever accept someone’s theory if it couldn’t be proven logically? Robin: No - HSC - SSCE Studies of Religion - Question 18 - 2020 - Paper 1
Question 18
Charlie: Would you ever accept someone’s theory if it couldn’t be proven logically? Robin: No. All statements and theories are meaningless, unless they can be verifi... show full transcript
Worked Solution & Example Answer:Charlie: Would you ever accept someone’s theory if it couldn’t be proven logically? Robin: No - HSC - SSCE Studies of Religion - Question 18 - 2020 - Paper 1
Step 1
How would Charlie and Robin best be described?
Answer
In analyzing the statements of Charlie and Robin, we can ascribe philosophical terms to their beliefs.
Charlie expresses the view that meanings can exist without definitive proof, suggesting a more open-minded approach to existence and truth, which aligns with humanism. He advocates for the significance of meanings beyond logical ability to prove, indicating a belief in values inherent in human experience rather than strict empirical evidence.
On the other hand, Robin firmly insists that acceptance of theories requires empirical verification, which leans towards a more critical or skeptical perspective often associated with atheism. His assertion implies rejection of faith-based beliefs without evidence.
Thus, the best fitting description of their beliefs is:
Answer: A. Charlie is a humanist and Robin is an atheist.