Photo AI

Assess the relative usefulness of the Park Model and the Hazard Management Cycle in understanding the impact of seismic events. - AQA - A-Level Geography - Question 5 - 2019 - Paper 1

Question icon

Question 5

Assess-the-relative-usefulness-of-the-Park-Model-and-the-Hazard-Management-Cycle-in-understanding-the-impact-of-seismic-events.-AQA-A-Level Geography-Question 5-2019-Paper 1.png

Assess the relative usefulness of the Park Model and the Hazard Management Cycle in understanding the impact of seismic events.

Worked Solution & Example Answer:Assess the relative usefulness of the Park Model and the Hazard Management Cycle in understanding the impact of seismic events. - AQA - A-Level Geography - Question 5 - 2019 - Paper 1

Step 1

Assess the relative usefulness of the Park Model

96%

114 rated

Answer

The Park Model (or Park's Disaster Response Curve) provides a framework for understanding how communities recover from seismic events over time. It illustrates the relationship between time and quality of life following a disaster. Key stages include:

  1. Pre-disaster Phase: Represents baseline quality of life before a seismic event.
  2. Impact Phase: Shows the initial drop in quality of life immediately after the event, indicating urgent needs for help and resources.
  3. Recovery Phase: Demonstrates gradual recovery, where quality of life improves as aid is provided.
  4. Reconstruction: Shows the potential for quality of life to exceed pre-disaster levels if effective measures are implemented.

By analyzing these stages, the model allows for the assessment of community resilience and effectiveness of response measures.

Step 2

Assess the relative usefulness of the Hazard Management Cycle

99%

104 rated

Answer

The Hazard Management Cycle outlines the stages of managing a disaster: prevention, preparedness, response, and recovery. It emphasizes proactive measures and planning before an event occurs. Key components include:

  1. Mitigation: Efforts taken to reduce the severity of a disaster.
  2. Preparedness: Planning and systems in place to respond effectively when a disaster strikes.
  3. Response: Immediate actions taken post-event to address needs and restore order.
  4. Recovery: Long-term processes to return to normalcy and improve community resilience.

This cycle highlights the importance of ongoing planning and response efforts, thereby enriching the response to seismic events.

Step 3

Compare the usefulness of both models in understanding seismic impacts

96%

101 rated

Answer

Both the Park Model and the Hazard Management Cycle are valuable tools for understanding seismic impacts, yet they serve different purposes.

  • The Park Model focuses on community recovery over time, making it ideal for evaluating the immediate impact and long-term resilience after a disaster. It visually illustrates the recovery process which helps in evaluating response effectiveness.

  • The Hazard Management Cycle, however, emphasizes pre-disaster planning and response. It provides a more systemic approach to disaster management, ensuring communities are better prepared before a seismic event occurs.

In conclusion, while the Park Model excels in post-disaster analysis, the Hazard Management Cycle enhances overall disaster preparedness and long-term risk management.

Join the A-Level students using SimpleStudy...

97% of Students

Report Improved Results

98% of Students

Recommend to friends

100,000+

Students Supported

1 Million+

Questions answered

;