During the 2006 Christmas holiday, John, a maths teacher, realised that he had fallen ill during 65% of the Christmas holidays since he had started teaching - AQA - A-Level Maths Mechanics - Question 12 - 2019 - Paper 3
Question 12
During the 2006 Christmas holiday, John, a maths teacher, realised that he had fallen ill during 65% of the Christmas holidays since he had started teaching.
In Jan... show full transcript
Worked Solution & Example Answer:During the 2006 Christmas holiday, John, a maths teacher, realised that he had fallen ill during 65% of the Christmas holidays since he had started teaching - AQA - A-Level Maths Mechanics - Question 12 - 2019 - Paper 3
Step 1
State hypotheses for one-tailed test
96%
114 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
Let the null hypothesis, H0: The proportion of times John falls ill during Christmas holidays after increasing exercise, p=0.65.
Let the alternative hypothesis, Ha: The proportion of times John falls ill during Christmas holidays after increasing exercise, p<0.65.
Step 2
State model used (condone 0.009 rather than 0.05 PI)
99%
104 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
We will use a binomial distribution with parameters:
n=7 (the number of Christmas holidays without illness since January 2007)
p=0.65 (the hypothesized probability of falling ill).
Step 3
Using calculator, 0.056 or better
96%
101 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
We need to find P(X≤2) where X is the number of times he falls ill. Using a binomial calculator:
P(X≤2)=∑k=02(k7)(0.65)k(0.35)7−k
Evaluating this gives approximately 0.0556.
Step 4
Evaluate binomial model by comparing P(X ≤ 2) with 0.05 PI
98%
120 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
Since P(X≤2)=0.0556, which is greater than the significance level of 0.05, we fail to reject the null hypothesis.
Step 5
Infer H0 accepted PI
97%
117 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
Based on our calculations, we accept the null hypothesis, indicating that there is not sufficient evidence to claim that John's rate of illness during the Christmas holidays has decreased since increasing his weekly exercise.
Step 6
Conclude correctly in context
97%
121 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
Thus, at the 5% level of significance, we conclude that there is no significant evidence that John's rate of illness during the Christmas holidays has decreased since he increased his weekly exercise.