Photo AI

Figure 3 shows part of the apparatus used to investigate electron diffraction - AQA - A-Level Physics - Question 3 - 2019 - Paper 7

Question icon

Question 3

Figure-3-shows-part-of-the-apparatus-used-to-investigate-electron-diffraction-AQA-A-Level Physics-Question 3-2019-Paper 7.png

Figure 3 shows part of the apparatus used to investigate electron diffraction. Electrons were accelerated through a potential difference to form a beam which was th... show full transcript

Worked Solution & Example Answer:Figure 3 shows part of the apparatus used to investigate electron diffraction - AQA - A-Level Physics - Question 3 - 2019 - Paper 7

Step 1

State de Broglie's hypothesis.

96%

114 rated

Answer

De Broglie's hypothesis states that all matter particles exhibit wave-like properties and have an associated wavelength given by the formula:

extwavelengthλ=hp ext{wavelength} \, \lambda = \frac{h}{p}

where hh is Planck's constant and pp is the momentum of the particle.

Step 2

Determine whether this voltmeter reading is consistent with a de Broglie wavelength for the electrons in the beam of about 0.02 nm.

99%

104 rated

Answer

To determine the consistency of the voltmeter reading with the de Broglie wavelength, we first convert the potential difference into kinetic energy:

KE=eV=(1.6×1019C)(3.5×103V)=5.6×1016JKE = eV = (1.6 \times 10^{-19} \, \text{C})(3.5 \times 10^{3} \, \text{V}) = 5.6 \times 10^{-16} \, \text{J}

The kinetic energy can be related to the momentum (pp) of the electron:

KE=p22mp=2m×KEKE = \frac{p^2}{2m} \Rightarrow p = \sqrt{2m \times KE}

Using the mass of an electron, m=9.11×1031kgm = 9.11 \times 10^{-31} \, \text{kg}:

p=2×(9.11×1031kg)×(5.6×1016J)1.52×1024kg m/sp = \sqrt{2 \times (9.11 \times 10^{-31} \, \text{kg}) \times (5.6 \times 10^{-16} \, \text{J})} \approx 1.52 \times 10^{-24} \, \text{kg m/s}

Now, we can find the de Broglie wavelength:

λ=hp=(6.63×1034Js)(1.52×1024kg m/s)4.36×1010m=0.436nm\lambda = \frac{h}{p} = \frac{(6.63 \times 10^{-34} \, \text{Js})}{(1.52 \times 10^{-24} \, \text{kg m/s})} \approx 4.36 \times 10^{-10} \, \text{m} = 0.436 \, \text{nm}

Since 0.436 nm is significantly greater than 0.02 nm, the voltmeter reading is not consistent with a de Broglie wavelength of 0.02 nm.

Step 3

State and explain two independent changes that could be made to the arrangement in Figure 3 to produce the result shown for the second experiment in Figure 4.

96%

101 rated

Answer

  1. Decrease the acceleration voltage: By lowering the voltage across the electron beam, the energy and hence the momentum of the electrons will decrease. This results in a longer de Broglie wavelength, which can lead to a wider diffraction pattern, as observed in the second experiment.

  2. Increase the distance between the metal foil and the photographic film: Increasing this distance allows the diffraction pattern to spread out more, producing a result similar to that seen in the second experiment.

These changes could effectively alter the diffraction patterns displayed in Figure 4.

Join the A-Level students using SimpleStudy...

97% of Students

Report Improved Results

98% of Students

Recommend to friends

100,000+

Students Supported

1 Million+

Questions answered

;