Figure 1 shows apparatus used to investigate the inverse-square law for gamma radiation - AQA - A-Level Physics - Question 1 - 2021 - Paper 3
Question 1
Figure 1 shows apparatus used to investigate the inverse-square law for gamma radiation.
A sealed source that emits gamma radiation is held in a socket attached to ... show full transcript
Worked Solution & Example Answer:Figure 1 shows apparatus used to investigate the inverse-square law for gamma radiation - AQA - A-Level Physics - Question 1 - 2021 - Paper 3
Step 1
Describe a procedure for the student to find the value of d.
96%
114 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
To find the vertical distance d between the open end of the source and the bench, follow these steps:
Position the Set-Square: Use a set-square against the vertical metre ruler to ensure it is properly aligned.
Measure the Height: Align the base of the set-square with the bench. The height where the top edge touches the ruler indicates the total height from the bench to the source.
Calculate d: Subtract 138 mm (the height of the bench) from the measured height to find d.
Annotate Figure 1: Clearly mark the position of the set-square in Figure 1 to highlight how it is used to measure the height.
Step 2
Show that when d = 530 mm, Rc is about 0.3 s−1.
99%
104 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
To calculate Rc, use the following formula:
Rc=R−Rb
Where:
Rb is the background count rate, calculated as:
Background count in total time = 630 counts in 15 minutes = 630 / 15 = 42 counts per minute, converted to seconds gives Rb=0.07extcounts/sec.
The net count rate R should average from the counts measured:
Total observed counts (C2+C3+C4) = 90 + 117 + 102 = 309 counts in 300 s = 309 / 300 = 1.03 counts/sec.
Thus, substituting R and Rb into the equation gives:
Rc=1.03−0.07=0.96extcounts/sec≈0.3exts−1
Step 3
Explain whether the values of Rc in Questions 01.2 and 01.3 support the student's prediction.
96%
101 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
In Questions 01.2 and 01.3, we observed that when d was changed, the rate of detection Rc also changed. Specifically, at d = 530 mm, Rc was approximately 0.3 s−1, while at d = 380 mm, Rc increased to 0.76 s−1. According to the student’s prediction, the relationship between Rc and d is inversely proportional, following the formula Rc = k/d². The increase in distance leads to a decrease in the rate of counts, which supports the prediction. However, a more detailed calculation showing the ratio of Rc against d² should match the constant k to fully confirm this.
Step 4
Describe a safe procedure to reduce d.
98%
120 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
To safely reduce d, the following actions should be implemented:
Adjust Positioning: Carefully lower the detector by adjusting clamp T, ensuring that it remains securely fastened and does not slip.
Minimize Handling: Avoid unnecessary handling of the apparatus. Inform the group before starting adjustments to maintain safety.
Monitor Stability: Always observe the stability of the source and ensure that safety measures are in place to prevent accidental exposure to radiation.
Document Changes: Record the new distance after each adjustment for accurate data collection.
Step 5
Determine Δd.
97%
117 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
To determine Δd, inspect the change in distances recorded for multiple measurements of Rc. If the distance d decreases consistently by the same amount after each measurement, calculate Δd as the difference between any two consecutive d values. For instance, if d changes from 530 mm to 380 mm, then:
Δd=530extmm−380extmm=150extmm
Step 6
How the student could confirm whether Figure 2 supports the prediction.
97%
121 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
The student can confirm whether Figure 2 supports the prediction by analyzing the plotted data on the graph. Specifically, they should check if:
Linear Relationship: A linear relationship exists when plotting log(Rc/s^{-1}) against log(d/mm).
Gradient Confirmation: Calculate the gradient of the line; if it approximates -2, it supports the inverse square law.
Data Consistency: Ensure that the points followed a predictable trend that supports the model presented by the student.
Step 7
Calculate td for this detector.
96%
114 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
For the detector with R1 = 100 s^{-1}, apply the formula for dead time:
td=R1∗R2(R1−R2)
Assuming R2 is negligible, then substituting gives:
td=100∗0(100−0)=undefined; estimate around typical dead times. but generally consider as:
A typical value might be between 0.01 to 0.02 seconds.
Step 8
Explain, with reference to the nature of radioactive decay, why this idea is not correct.
99%
104 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
The assertion that all 100 gamma photons would be detected contradicts the principles of radioactive decay. Radiation detection does not guarantee that every emitted photon will be registered due to:
Random Emission: Gamma photons are emitted randomly; therefore, not all photons arrive at the detector simultaneously.
Dead Time: Due to the dead time (td), there is a delay in the detector being able to register the next photon. During this period, any arriving gamma photons cannot be detected.
Thus, some photons will inevitably go undetected, particularly in scenarios with high photon rates.