Photo AI

Figure 1 shows apparatus used to investigate the inverse-square law for gamma radiation - AQA - A-Level Physics - Question 1 - 2021 - Paper 3

Question icon

Question 1

Figure-1-shows-apparatus-used-to-investigate-the-inverse-square-law-for-gamma-radiation-AQA-A-Level Physics-Question 1-2021-Paper 3.png

Figure 1 shows apparatus used to investigate the inverse-square law for gamma radiation. Figure 1 A sealed source that emits gamma radiation is held in a socket at... show full transcript

Worked Solution & Example Answer:Figure 1 shows apparatus used to investigate the inverse-square law for gamma radiation - AQA - A-Level Physics - Question 1 - 2021 - Paper 3

Step 1

Describe a procedure for the student to find the value of d, the vertical distance between the open end of the source and the bench.

96%

114 rated

Answer

  1. Use the vertical metre ruler on the apparatus to measure the height of the radiation detector. Ensure that the measurement is taken from the tip of the radiation detector to the bench surface, as shown in Figure 1.

  2. Subtract the height of the bench (138 mm) from the height of the radiation detector to find the value for d.

  3. Annotate Figure 1 to include a set-square placed in contact with the detector and the bench, ensuring that the set-square illustrates a right angle to verify accurate measurement.

Step 2

Show that when d = 530 mm, Rc is about 0.33 s⁻¹.

99%

104 rated

Answer

To determine the corrected count rate Rc, we use the formula:
[ R_c = R - R_b ]
where R is the total count rate and R_b is the background count rate.

First, calculate the uncorrected count rate for d = 530 mm:
[ R = \frac{C_1 + C_2 + C_3}{3} = \frac{90 + 117 + 102}{3} = 103 \text{ counts in } 100 s \approx 1.03 \text{ counts/s} ]
The background count C1 needs to be converted to a rate:
[ R_b = \frac{630}{15 \times 60} \approx 0.7 \text{ counts/s} ]
Thus, if we compute:
[ R_c = 1.03 - 0.7 = 0.33 \text{ s}^{-1} ]
This confirms that Rc is approximately 0.33 s⁻¹.

Step 3

Explain whether the values of Rc in Questions 01.2 and 01.3 support the student's prediction.

96%

101 rated

Answer

The student's prediction states that Rc is inversely proportional to the square of the distance d. We can analyze the counts for the two distances:

  • At d = 530 mm, Rc is calculated to be approximately 0.33 s⁻¹.
  • At d = 380 mm, Rc shows a value of 0.76 s⁻¹.

Using the prediction formula ( R_c = \frac{k}{d^2} ):
[ RC \propto \frac{1}{d^2} ]
will imply that as d decreases, Rc should increase.
Since Rc increased from approximately 0.33 s⁻¹ to 0.76 s⁻¹ when d changed from 530 mm to 380 mm, the values do support the student's prediction.

Step 4

Describe a safe procedure to reduce d. Give a reason for your procedure.

98%

120 rated

Answer

  1. To safely reduce d, the student should adjust the position of the detector downwards, ensuring it is securely clamped at each measurement to prevent falls.

  2. It is essential to lower slowly and take care to have all connections checked to avoid any accidental movement of the sealed source while making adjustments.
    This approach minimizes the risk of radiation exposure while ensuring accurate measurements.

Step 5

Determine Δd.

97%

117 rated

Answer

Δd can be determined from the data points indicated in Figure 2. If the values of d have been plotted and the changes noted after each measurement, then simply take the difference between two successive values of d.
For instance, if d changes from 380 mm to 440 mm, then:
[ Δd = 440 ext{ mm} - 380 ext{ mm} = 60 ext{ mm} ] Assuming consistent intervals, the value of Δd would be consistent across measurements.

Step 6

How the student could confirm whether Figure 2 supports the prediction:

97%

121 rated

Answer

To confirm the prediction illustrated by Figure 2, the student can perform the following steps:

  1. Confirm that the plotted graph shows a linear relationship between ( \log(R_c) ) and ( \log(d) ).
  2. Calculate the slope (gradient) of the line; it should equate to -2 if the prediction is correct, reflecting the inverse square relationship.
  3. If the gradient does not equal -2, it would imply that the relationship does not support the student's prediction.

Step 7

Calculate tₗ for this detector.

96%

114 rated

Answer

Using the provided information, the average measured count rate Rₗ is 100 s⁻¹.
The average photon rate that enters the detector is 2 per second.
To calculate the dead time ( tₗ ):
[ t_𝑙 = \frac{R_l - R_c}{R_c R_2} ]
Assuming that R₂ is the corrected measure, we substitute the known values, leading to a calculation of ( t_𝑙 ).
In this case, the specific value will require the measured corrections to compute.

Step 8

Explain, with reference to the nature of radioactive decay, why this idea is not correct.

99%

104 rated

Answer

The student’s assertion relies on the assumption that all incoming photons would be detected without interruption. However, due to the random nature of radioactive decay, even if 100 photons are emitted in one second, there is a statistical likelihood that not all photons will arrive at the detector within that timeframe.
The dead time associated with the detector means that some emitted photons could arrive within the time window where the detector is still busy processing previously detected photons.
Therefore, some gamma photons are inevitably lost, leading to detection rates that do not equal the emission rates.

Join the A-Level students using SimpleStudy...

97% of Students

Report Improved Results

98% of Students

Recommend to friends

100,000+

Students Supported

1 Million+

Questions answered

;