Photo AI

Figure 3 shows part of the apparatus used to investigate electron diffraction - AQA - A-Level Physics - Question 3 - 2019 - Paper 7

Question icon

Question 3

Figure-3-shows-part-of-the-apparatus-used-to-investigate-electron-diffraction-AQA-A-Level Physics-Question 3-2019-Paper 7.png

Figure 3 shows part of the apparatus used to investigate electron diffraction. Electrons were accelerated through a potential difference to form a beam which was th... show full transcript

Worked Solution & Example Answer:Figure 3 shows part of the apparatus used to investigate electron diffraction - AQA - A-Level Physics - Question 3 - 2019 - Paper 7

Step 1

State de Broglie's hypothesis.

96%

114 rated

Answer

De Broglie's hypothesis states that all matter particles exhibit wave-like properties, and consequently have a wavelength associated with their momentum. The wavelength ( ( \lambda )) of a particle is given by the equation: λ=hp\lambda = \frac{h}{p} where ( h ) is Planck's constant and ( p ) is the momentum of the particle.

Step 2

Determine whether this voltmeter reading is consistent with a de Broglie wavelength for the electrons in the beam of about 0.02 nm.

99%

104 rated

Answer

To determine this, we first need to calculate the de Broglie wavelength using the provided voltage.

The kinetic energy ( ( KE )) of the electrons is given by: KE=eVKE = eV Substituting in the given values, where ( e ) is the charge of an electron (approximately ( 1.6 \times 10^{-19} ) C) and ( V = 3.5 \times 10^3 ) V: KE=1.6×1019×3.5×103=5.6×1016 JKE = 1.6 \times 10^{-19} \times 3.5 \times 10^3 = 5.6 \times 10^{-16} \text{ J}

The relationship between kinetic energy and momentum ( ( p )) is: KE=p22mKE = \frac{p^2}{2m} Rearranging gives: p=2m×KEp = \sqrt{2m \times KE} Substituting the mass of an electron (approximately ( 9.11 \times 10^{-31} \text{ kg} )) yields: p=2×9.11×1031×5.6×1016=1.14×1024 kg m/sp = \sqrt{2 \times 9.11 \times 10^{-31} \times 5.6 \times 10^{-16}} = 1.14 \times 10^{-24} \text{ kg m/s}

Now applying de Broglie's equation: λ=hp\lambda = \frac{h}{p} where ( h ) is Planck's constant ( ( 6.63 \times 10^{-34} \text{ J s} )). Thus, λ=6.63×10341.14×10245.8×1010extm=0.058extnm\lambda = \frac{6.63 \times 10^{-34}}{1.14 \times 10^{-24}} \approx 5.8 \times 10^{-10} ext{ m} = 0.058 ext{ nm}

Since the calculated wavelength (0.058 nm) does not match with the given value of approximately 0.02 nm, the voltmeter reading is not consistent with a de Broglie wavelength of 0.02 nm.

Step 3

State and explain two independent changes that could be made to the arrangement in Figure 3 to produce the result shown for the second experiment in Figure 4.

96%

101 rated

Answer

First Change

Statement 1: Increase the accelerating voltage. Relevant Change: A higher accelerating voltage increases the energy of the electrons, which decreases the de Broglie wavelength, allowing for better resolution in diffraction patterns.

Second Change

Statement 2: Use a target with greater spacing between atoms. Relevant Change: Having a target with larger atomic spacing enables clearer diffraction patterns due to increased interference effects, which can be observed in the more pronounced rings in the second experiment.

Join the A-Level students using SimpleStudy...

97% of Students

Report Improved Results

98% of Students

Recommend to friends

100,000+

Students Supported

1 Million+

Questions answered

;