Photo AI
Andi is a clinical psychologist who is investigating whether family relationships improve or deteriorate once a person has been diagnosed with a mental health disorder - AQA - A-Level Psychology - Question 2 - 2020 - Paper 2
Question 2
Andi is a clinical psychologist who is investigating whether family relationships improve or deteriorate once a person has been diagnosed with a mental health disord... show full transcript
Worked Solution & Example Answer:Andi is a clinical psychologist who is investigating whether family relationships improve or deteriorate once a person has been diagnosed with a mental health disorder - AQA - A-Level Psychology - Question 2 - 2020 - Paper 2
Step 1
Suggest one open question Andi may use in her interview about the influence of diagnosis on family relationships.
Answer
An appropriate open question that Andi may use is: "How has your relationship with your family member been affected by their mental health disorder?" This question allows interviewees to share personal experiences in their own words, providing deeper insights into the dynamics of family relationships.
Step 2
State two reasons why Andi used the chi-squared test on her data.
Answer
- Andi was looking for a difference in relationships in patients and their families who were waiting for a diagnosis versus those who had a diagnosis.
- She used nominal data as she measured whether family relationships had improved or deteriorated.
Step 3
Explain whether Andi’s results were significant for a one-tailed (directional) hypothesis when p≤0.01.
Answer
Andi's observed value was 5.84, and with df=1, the critical value for a one-tailed test at p≤0.01 is 5.02. Since 5.84 is greater than 5.02, this indicates that the results are statistically significant. Therefore, we can conclude that there is a significant difference in family relationships depending on the diagnosis status.
Step 4
State one strength and one weakness of thematic analysis as used by Andi.
Answer
Strength: Thematic analysis allows Andi to reduce the large amount of data she has received about family relationships into manageable themes, making key findings easily understandable for specific groups involved in mental health.
Weakness: Thematic analysis could be biased if Andi interprets the data based on her own perspectives, potentially overlooking themes that are crucial for the patients’ families related to their experiences.