Photo AI

Job interview Researchers wanted to investigate how long it took interviewers to make a decision to hire an employee through a job interview - AQA - A-Level Psychology - Question 2 - 2019 - Paper 3

Question icon

Question 2

Job-interview--Researchers-wanted-to-investigate-how-long-it-took-interviewers-to-make-a-decision-to-hire-an-employee-through-a-job-interview-AQA-A-Level Psychology-Question 2-2019-Paper 3.png

Job interview Researchers wanted to investigate how long it took interviewers to make a decision to hire an employee through a job interview. The researchers wanted... show full transcript

Worked Solution & Example Answer:Job interview Researchers wanted to investigate how long it took interviewers to make a decision to hire an employee through a job interview - AQA - A-Level Psychology - Question 2 - 2019 - Paper 3

Step 1

Calculate the ratio of those interviewers who reported making their decision in under 1 minute to those interviewers who reported making their decision in more than 15 minutes.

96%

114 rated

Answer

From Table 3, 5% of interviewers made their decision in under 1 minute, and 45% of interviewers made their decision in more than 15 minutes. To express this as a ratio, we can simplify:

The ratio is rac{5}{45} = rac{1}{9}. Therefore, the ratio of interviewers making their decision in under 1 minute to those making it in more than 15 minutes is 1:9.

Step 2

Analyse the data in Table 4 to explain one conclusion that the researchers might draw from these results.

99%

104 rated

Answer

One conclusion from Table 4 is that experience of the interviewer seems to be the most significant contributing factor for making a quick hiring decision. This is indicated by the highest tally (##), suggesting that interviewers who were more experienced made quicker decisions more often than others.

Step 3

Explain two ways that subjectivity could have influenced the job interview study.

96%

101 rated

Answer

  1. Estimation Bias: The interviewers might have estimated the time taken for their decisions subjectively, leading to inaccuracies in reporting how long it truly took them. For example, they may have felt pressured to state shorter times to appear efficient.

  2. Personal Interpretation: Interviewers' personal feelings about candidates or their own biases could lead to different interpretations of what constitutes a 'quick decision,' thereby affecting their responses.

Step 4

Explain one way the researchers could have made sure the job interview study was reliable.

98%

120 rated

Answer

The researchers could have implemented standardized, structured interviews where all interviewers asked the same questions in the same order. This consistency would help ensure that the data collected is uniform across all interviews, enhancing the reliability of the study.

Join the A-Level students using SimpleStudy...

97% of Students

Report Improved Results

98% of Students

Recommend to friends

100,000+

Students Supported

1 Million+

Questions answered

;