Photo AI
Motsi carried out an investigation to see if culture had an influence on the treatments people accessed for their mental health disorders - AQA - A-Level Psychology - Question 2 - 2021 - Paper 2
Question 2
Motsi carried out an investigation to see if culture had an influence on the treatments people accessed for their mental health disorders. She studied people in the... show full transcript
Worked Solution & Example Answer:Motsi carried out an investigation to see if culture had an influence on the treatments people accessed for their mental health disorders - AQA - A-Level Psychology - Question 2 - 2021 - Paper 2
Step 1
Describe how Motsi may have gathered her volunteer sample.
Answer
Motsi may have gathered her volunteer sample by posting advertisements online in both the UK and Japan. She could ask individuals to participate in her study on treatments for mental health disorders. For instance, she might specify that interested participants respond to her advertisement via email or a dedicated website. Motsi could then select the first 25 individuals who expressed interest in participating and inquire about the types of treatments they used.
Step 2
Explain one reason why a random sample of participants may be better than a volunteer sample of participants for Motsi's investigation.
Answer
A random sample ensures that every individual with a mental health disorder in both Japan and the UK has an equal chance of being selected for the study. This method enhances the representativeness of the sample, as it does not rely on self-selection. In contrast, a volunteer sample might attract participants who are particularly motivated to seek treatment, potentially skewing the findings and making them less representative of the broader population.
Step 3
Explain one weakness of Motsi using an unstructured interview for her investigation.
Answer
One weakness of using an unstructured interview is that it allows for variable questioning; Motsi may ask different questions based on participants' responses. This inconsistency can lead to challenges in comparing data, as the responses may vary significantly depending on how each participant interprets Motsi's questions. Consequently, this variability could complicate her ability to draw clear conclusions about treatment patterns in Japan and the UK.