Photo AI

Using the source, evaluate the view that in a democracy MPs are free to ignore referendum results and their own political party’s manifesto - Edexcel - A-Level Politics - Question 1 - 2021 - Paper 1

Question icon

Question 1

Using-the-source,-evaluate-the-view-that-in-a-democracy-MPs-are-free-to-ignore-referendum-results-and-their-own-political-party’s-manifesto-Edexcel-A-Level Politics-Question 1-2021-Paper 1.png

Using the source, evaluate the view that in a democracy MPs are free to ignore referendum results and their own political party’s manifesto. In Source 2, two letter... show full transcript

Worked Solution & Example Answer:Using the source, evaluate the view that in a democracy MPs are free to ignore referendum results and their own political party’s manifesto - Edexcel - A-Level Politics - Question 1 - 2021 - Paper 1

Step 1

compare and contrast different opinions in the source

96%

114 rated

Answer

The letters present contrasting views on the responsibilities of MPs. One view emphasizes that MPs should always follow their party manifestos and honor the commitments made to voters. This reflects a traditional understanding of political representation where party loyalty is paramount. Conversely, the other view advocates for flexibility, suggesting that when circumstances change, MPs should be empowered to adjust their positions, thus prioritizing the immediate interests of their constituents. This indicates a more pragmatic approach to democracy, allowing MPs to respond to evolving societal needs.

Step 2

evaluate and debate these views in a balanced way

99%

104 rated

Answer

Evaluating both perspectives reveals the complexities of democratic representation. On one hand, adhering strictly to party manifestos can foster stability and predictability in governance. It ensures that voters know what to expect from their representatives. However, this rigid adherence can also stifle necessary change and responsiveness to new information. On the other hand, allowing MPs to disregard their party’s manifesto in favor of constituent interests can be seen as a betrayal of the party's principles. This raises ethical concerns about accountability and trust within the political system. Ultimately, striking a balance between these viewpoints is crucial for a functional democracy.

Step 3

analyze and evaluate only the information presented in the source

96%

101 rated

Answer

Analyzing the source further, it is evident that the letters address significant democratic principles. The argument for MPs to follow the manifesto emphasizes a commitment to the democratic process, where promises made during campaigns must be honored. In contrast, the suggestion that MPs should adapt their views based on changing circumstances highlights the dynamic nature of public opinion and governance. Therefore, both arguments underscore the tension between accountability to party and responsiveness to public needs, reflecting the inherent challenges faced by elected representatives in a democracy.

Join the A-Level students using SimpleStudy...

97% of Students

Report Improved Results

98% of Students

Recommend to friends

100,000+

Students Supported

1 Million+

Questions answered

;