To what extent is ecologism more united than divided? You must use appropriate thinkers you have studied to support your answer and consider differing views in a balanced way. - Edexcel - A-Level Politics - Question 4 - 2020 - Paper 2

Ecologists adopt a holistic perspective on human relationships with nature, emphasizing interconnectedness and the responsibility that arises from it. They are largely unified in rejecting consumerism and materialism, associating these with detrimental impacts on ecological health. Furthermore, the promotion of sustainable practices illustrates a collective commitment to changing social patterns of production and consumption towards a more ecologically balanced society.

Conversely, significant divisions exist within ecologism itself. There are stark disagreements between deep greens, who advocate for radical change, and social ecologists who support a more reformist approach. Additionally, underlying tensions between holistic and anthropocentric methodologies indicate a spectrum of beliefs within ecologism that can lead to fragmented ideologies.

These divisions can create challenges for a cohesive ecologist movement as different factions prioritize varying solutions. The deep greens' radical responses to climate issues often clash with the more pragmatic approaches of social ecologists, complicating unified action. Both factions may struggle to find common ground due to their foundational beliefs regarding human connection to nature.

In assessing the overall unity versus division within ecologism, it is evident that while there is substantial agreement on the rejection of anthropocentrism and the need for sustainability, significant ideological divides regarding the approach to achieving these goals persist. Hence, we can conclude that ecologism is indeed more divided than united, as the differing philosophies lead to varied strategies and policies that often conflict.