Photo AI
Source 2 contains arguments for and against retaining our current constitutional arrangements - Edexcel - A-Level Politics - Question 1 - 2020 - Paper 2
Question 1
Source 2 contains arguments for and against retaining our current constitutional arrangements. Source 2 Without entrenchment, it is too easy for a government with ... show full transcript
Worked Solution & Example Answer:Source 2 contains arguments for and against retaining our current constitutional arrangements - Edexcel - A-Level Politics - Question 1 - 2020 - Paper 2
Step 1
compare and contrast different opinions in the source
Answer
The source presents two contrasting views regarding the UK's constitution. On one hand, it argues that without entrenchment, a simple majority government can enact significant constitutional changes, potentially threatening fundamental rights. It emphasizes the need for a written, codified constitution to safeguard these rights. Conversely, the source also highlights that the UK's uncodified constitution has successfully evolved, with many principles now enshrined in law. This reflects how the constitutional framework adapts flexibly to societal and political changes.
Step 2
examine and debate these views in a balanced way
Answer
The arguments for major constitutional reform emphasize the inadequacy of conventions and incomplete reforms initiated by the Blair government. This view suggests a disconnect between the UK's political system and those of other democratic nations, which may require adapting to more defined frameworks. In contrast, the position against major reform argues that the UK's long-standing respect for rights and parliamentary sovereignty provides a reliable mechanism to address contemporary issues without a drastic overhaul. This debate hinges on whether the current system can adequately protect rights in the face of potential governmental overreach.
Step 3
analyse and evaluate only the information presented in the source
Answer
The analysis reveals that while the source acknowledges potential threats without a codified constitution, it also provides evidence of the robustness of the UK's existing framework. Rights have been enshrined in laws, such as the HRA and Devolution Acts, demonstrating effective protection through existing legislation. Furthermore, the source indicates that parliamentary sovereignty allows for necessary adaptations to the law. Consequently, one can conclude that while reforms may be needed, the current constitution does not necessitate major change, as it has mechanisms to adapt and protect rights effectively.