With reference to the sources and your own knowledge, explain the factors a prime minister considers when appointing or dismissing ministers.
- Edexcel - A-Level Politics - Question 2 - 2014 - Paper 2
Question 2
With reference to the sources and your own knowledge, explain the factors a prime minister considers when appointing or dismissing ministers.
Worked Solution & Example Answer:With reference to the sources and your own knowledge, explain the factors a prime minister considers when appointing or dismissing ministers.
- Edexcel - A-Level Politics - Question 2 - 2014 - Paper 2
Step 1
To provide a progression for talented backbenchers.
96%
114 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
A prime minister often seeks to reward and motivate backbenchers who have shown potential and dedication in their roles. By appointing them to ministerial positions, it not only encourages their political growth but also strengthens party loyalty and morale.
Step 2
Because a politician may be a strong ally of a powerful cabinet member.
99%
104 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
The dynamics of cabinet relationships are crucial. Appointing allies of influential cabinet members can create a supportive environment, ensuring smoother governance and collaboration. Conversely, dismissing those who do not align with key members may reflect a need to maintain harmony within the leadership.
Step 3
To promote people who have a proven record of delivery.
96%
101 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
Selecting individuals who have demonstrated effectiveness in their previous roles is vital. A prime minister is likely to consider their track record in delivering results, as this builds trust and confidence among the electorate and within the party.
Step 4
A PM may be dissatisfied with the performance of a minister.
98%
120 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
If a minister is underperforming or failing to meet expectations, the prime minister may decide to dismiss them. This action is often taken to uphold accountability and the credibility of the government.
Step 5
The prime minister wishes to reward his close allies and supporters.
97%
117 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
Political loyalty is often rewarded through ministerial appointments. The prime minister may consider promoting loyalists to maintain a stable and supportive cabinet that aligns with his vision and objectives.
Step 6
He may wish to change the political balance of the cabinet.
97%
121 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
In efforts to reflect broader political considerations, the prime minister may appoint or dismiss ministers to achieve a more balanced representation of different factions or demographics within the party.
Step 7
He may wish to promote individuals to change the gender/social background/ethnic makeup of the cabinet.
96%
114 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
A prime minister may aim to enhance diversity within the cabinet. Appointments may be made to ensure representation across gender, ethnicity, and social backgrounds, aligning with modern governance expectations.
Step 8
He may wish to 'gag' a potential adversary by subjecting them to collective responsibility.
99%
104 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
If a minister is viewed as a potential threat or rival, the prime minister may choose to place them in a position where they must adhere to collective cabinet decisions, thus limiting their ability to criticize or oppose government policy effectively.