Photo AI
Using the source, evaluate the view that the Supreme Court has strengthened parliamentary sovereignty - Edexcel - A-Level Politics - Question 1 - 2021 - Paper 2
Question 1
Using the source, evaluate the view that the Supreme Court has strengthened parliamentary sovereignty. In your response you must: - compare and contrast different ... show full transcript
Worked Solution & Example Answer:Using the source, evaluate the view that the Supreme Court has strengthened parliamentary sovereignty - Edexcel - A-Level Politics - Question 1 - 2021 - Paper 2
Step 1
compare and contrast different opinions in the source
Answer
The source presents contrasting perspectives on the role of the Supreme Court in relation to parliamentary sovereignty. On one hand, Conservative MP Andrew Bridgen criticizes the Supreme Court for undermining democratic processes, suggesting that its judgment disregards the will of the electorate, as expressed in the 2016 referendum. This viewpoint implies that the Court has overstepped its boundaries and may be deemed too powerful, affecting the sovereignty of Parliament negatively.
On the other hand, Gina Miller argues that the Supreme Court’s intervention is beneficial for parliamentary sovereignty. She posits that judicial reviews, which scrutinize the actions of the executive, are essential in holding the government accountable. This perspective sees the Court not as a hindrance but as a protector of parliamentary sovereignty, ensuring that Parliament retains its authority in the face of potential executive overreach.
Step 2
evaluate the view that the source is in a balanced way
Answer
The source presents a balanced view by incorporating two opposing opinions regarding the Supreme Court's role. While it features criticism from Bridgen, it equally provides a defense from Gina Miller, illustrating the complexities of the debate surrounding the Court’s authority. By placing these viewpoints side by side, the source allows readers to see the tension between political executive power and judicial oversight, which enriches the discourse on parliamentary sovereignty. Thus, the source effectively maintains a balanced approach by representing both sides of the argument.
Step 3
analyse and evaluate only the information presented in the source
Answer
The information within the source reveals a significant tension between the perceived authority of the Supreme Court and the practice of parliamentary sovereignty. Critics, such as Bridgen, argue that the Court's decisions can undermine democratic outcomes, emphasizing a preference for electoral outcomes over judicial intervention. This view reflects a common concern that the judiciary may override the will of the people as expressed through referendums.
Conversely, supporters like Miller highlight the necessity of judicial reviews in ensuring that Parliament's intentions and sovereignty are upheld against potential government overreach. The source importantly acknowledges the Court's role in clarifying the boundaries of power within the UK’s constitutional framework. Overall, the arguments presented indicate that while the Supreme Court's strength may raise concerns among certain politicians, it can also be viewed as a crucial component protecting parliamentary sovereignty and the democratic process.