Photo AI
Using the source, evaluate the view that the Supreme Court has strengthened parliamentary sovereignty - Edexcel - A-Level Politics - Question 1 - 2021 - Paper 2
Question 1
Using the source, evaluate the view that the Supreme Court has strengthened parliamentary sovereignty. In your response you must: - compare and contrast opinions i... show full transcript
Worked Solution & Example Answer:Using the source, evaluate the view that the Supreme Court has strengthened parliamentary sovereignty - Edexcel - A-Level Politics - Question 1 - 2021 - Paper 2
Step 1
Compare and contrast opinions in the source
Answer
The source presents two contrasting views regarding the Supreme Court's impact on parliamentary sovereignty. Andrew Bridgen criticizes the Court, labeling its judgment as a disregard for democracy and the 2016 referendum outcome, arguing that it undermines parliament's authority. In contrast, Gina Miller contends that the Court's ruling is a win for parliamentary sovereignty, emphasizing that judicial reviews act as a check on executive authority. This highlights a tension in perspectives, with one view focused on parliamentary supremacy being eroded, while the other perceives the Court as essential in upholding parliamentary sovereignty against an overreaching executive.
Step 2
Use evidence from the source in a balanced way
Answer
Bridgen's statement about the Supreme Court's judgment being an 'absolute disgrace' captures the sentiment that the ruling undermines democratic principles. He argues that judges are ignoring the public's decision made during the referendum, thus weakening parliamentary sovereignty. Conversely, Miller's argument refers to the necessity of judicial reviews for maintaining checks and balances, stating that the legality of executive actions needs scrutiny. Both positions reflect significant, yet opposing, perspectives on the role of the Court in relation to parliamentary authority.
Step 3
Analyse and evaluate only the information presented in the text
Answer
The overall evaluation of the Supreme Court's influence on parliamentary sovereignty hinges on different perceptions of judicial power. Critics assert that judicial involvement erodes parliamentary authority, suggesting a shift in power dynamics. However, proponents like Miller argue that the Court reinforces parliamentary sovereignty by ensuring the government adheres to the law and respects democratic processes. This scenario illustrates the complex interaction between judiciary oversight and legislative authority, indicating that the Court's role could be viewed as both empowering and limiting depending on the context of its rulings.