Photo AI
This source is adapted from a Guardian article in September 2019 - Edexcel - A-Level Politics - Question 1 - 2021 - Paper 2
Question 1
This source is adapted from a Guardian article in September 2019. It reports on the unanimous judgement by the Supreme Court that the proroguing of Parliament by Bor... show full transcript
Worked Solution & Example Answer:This source is adapted from a Guardian article in September 2019 - Edexcel - A-Level Politics - Question 1 - 2021 - Paper 2
Step 1
Compare and contrast opinions in Source 2 regarding parliamentary sovereignty
Answer
In Source 2, the opinions on parliamentary sovereignty are sharply divided. Conservative MP Andrew Bridgen views the Supreme Court's ruling as a threat to democracy, arguing that it undermines the referendum result of 2016. He posits that unelected judges are overstepping their bounds by interfering with the democratic will of the people. Conversely, Gina Miller presents a contrasting viewpoint, asserting that the court's action affirms parliamentary sovereignty by checking the power of the executive. She believes that judicial reviews serve to preserve the integrity of Parliament and maintain the balance of power.
Step 2
Discuss how the view of the Supreme Court is balanced away
Answer
The discussion around the Supreme Court's role affects perspectives on parliamentary sovereignty. Critics like Bridgen emphasize that the Court's involvement creates a potential conflict between judicial authority and the elected Parliament, suggesting that judicial overreach can complicate or undermine democratic processes. On the other hand, Miller contends that the Court's intervention is essential for maintaining checks and balances. While one perspective warns of power erosion, the other highlights the necessity of judicial oversight to protect parliamentary sovereignty from executive overreach.
Step 3
Analyse and evaluate only the information presented in the sources
Answer
The sources provide a nuanced view of the Supreme Court's impact on parliamentary sovereignty. Bridgen's perspective reflects concerns about the growing power of the judiciary and its implications for democratic legitimacy. In contrast, Miller's argument emphasizes that the Court actually fortifies parliamentary sovereignty by ensuring the government adheres to legal and constitutional norms. Overall, the sources depict an ongoing debate about the balance of power between the judiciary and Parliament, raising important questions about the proper role of judicial review in a democratic society.