Photo AI
Question 1
Source 2 contains arguments for and against retaining our current constitutional arrangements. Source 2 Without entrenchment, it is too easy for a government with ... show full transcript
Step 1
Answer
The source presents two perspectives on the UK's constitution. On one hand, it argues that without entrenchment, a government can easily make constitutional changes that threaten fundamental rights. This view underscores the need for a written constitution that would require special procedures for amendments. It highlights that many principles are merely conventions, underscoring their lack of enforcement.
Conversely, it asserts that the UK's uncodified constitution has successfully evolved, enabling flexible governance and accommodating circumstances through parliamentary sovereignty. This perspective maintains that significant changes have already been inscribed into law, protecting rights as evidenced by judicial oversight.
Step 2
Answer
Examining these views highlights a tension in understanding the necessity for constitutional reform versus the existing framework's resilience. Proponents of the need for change argue that the lack of formalized rules leaves room for governmental overreach, suggesting a codified constitution could safeguard democratic principles. However, critics point to the effectiveness of the existing system, arguing that the adaptability of parliamentary sovereignty allows for timely responses to threats without requiring extensive legislative overhaul.
The unresolved nature of significant reforms initiated by the past administration also reflects this debate, indicating a gap between intention and implementation.
Step 3
Answer
The source's evaluation of the UK constitution leans toward the view that major changes are necessary due to the risk posed by a lack of entrenchment and enforceable conventions. However, it also concedes that the current structure has evolved significantly and is largely effective in practice, shielding rights and facilitating responsive governance. The text implies that while reforms are needed, particularly regarding the political system's structure, many mechanisms already exist that effectively protect democratic values. This creates a nuanced understanding that substantial amendments may not be as critical as suggested, provided the existing constitutional arrangements continue to adapt.
Report Improved Results
Recommend to friends
Students Supported
Questions answered