Photo AI
For this question, you need to refer to the whole of Source A, together with the whole of Source B - AQA - GCSE English Language - Question 4 - 2021 - Paper 1
Question 4
For this question, you need to refer to the whole of Source A, together with the whole of Source B. Compare how the writers convey their different attitudes to swe... show full transcript
Worked Solution & Example Answer:For this question, you need to refer to the whole of Source A, together with the whole of Source B - AQA - GCSE English Language - Question 4 - 2021 - Paper 1
Step 1
compare their different attitudes to sweets
Answer
In Source A, the writer conveys a nostalgic and enthusiastic attitude towards sweets, reminiscing about childhood experiences associated with them. This positivity is highlighted through vivid imagery, portraying sweets as joyful and comforting. Conversely, Source B presents a more cynical approach, critiquing the commercialization and potentially harmful practices in the sweets industry. The writer emphasizes the negative consequences of overindulgence and the misleading nature of marketing, leading to a critical perspective on sweets.
Step 2
compare the methods the writers use to convey their attitudes
Answer
The writer in Source A employs descriptive language and emotive imagery to evoke feelings of nostalgia and joy linked to sweets. Phrases like 'sweet memories' and 'indulgent bliss' effectively capture the essence of these positive experiences. In contrast, the writer in Source B utilizes a more analytical and critical tone, employing statistics and factual information about the sweets industry. This method serves to enlighten the reader about the darker side of sweets, highlighting issues such as health risks and ethical concerns.
Step 3
support your response with references to both texts
Answer
In Source A, the writer describes a 'celebration of childhood' associated with sweets, illustrating a personal connection that evokes nostalgia. On the other hand, Source B mentions the 'immoral practices' in the sweets industry, using phrases like 'misleading marketing' to emphasize the negative implications of consuming sweets. The contrast between the upbeat, fond recollections in Source A and the serious, critical analysis in Source B creates a compelling dialogue about sweets, enriching the reader's understanding of both perspectives.