Why might the authors of Interpretations A and B have a different interpretation about immigrants in America in the 1920s?
Explain your answer using Interpretations A and B and your contextual knowledge. - AQA - GCSE History - Question 2 - 2021 - Paper 1
Question 2
Why might the authors of Interpretations A and B have a different interpretation about immigrants in America in the 1920s?
Explain your answer using Interpretations... show full transcript
Worked Solution & Example Answer:Why might the authors of Interpretations A and B have a different interpretation about immigrants in America in the 1920s?
Explain your answer using Interpretations A and B and your contextual knowledge. - AQA - GCSE History - Question 2 - 2021 - Paper 1
Step 1
Interpretation A: Author's Background and Bias
96%
114 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
Interpretation A is authored by a Protestant bishop who likely has a biased view against immigrants, particularly those of Catholic background. This perspective may stem from a historical context of religious tension during the 1920s, where many Protestant Americans viewed Catholic immigrants as a social threat. Thus, the author's background could lead them to interpret immigrants in a negative light, emphasizing their perceived disadvantages.
Step 2
Interpretation B: Author’s Perspective and Advocacy
99%
104 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
Interpretation B is authored by Clancy, a Republican politician, who may adopt a more favorable view of immigrants. His interpretation likely recognizes the contributions of immigrants to American society and the economy, perhaps due to a political inclination to support immigration for labor needs. This context influences his positive portrayal of immigrants, seeing them as vital to America’s development.