How convincing is Interpretation A about the legal system under the Normans? Explain your answer based on your contextual knowledge and what it says in Interpretation A. - AQA - GCSE History - Question 1 - 2023 - Paper 2

To evaluate the convincing nature of Interpretation A regarding the legal system under the Normans, it is essential to consider both the content of the interpretation itself and the broader historical context. Interpretation A likely presents the view that the legal system was heavily influenced by Anglo-Saxon law, suggesting that the Normans sought continuity in governance to stabilize their rule.

Historically, the Normans did indeed integrate many aspects of Anglo-Saxon legal practices, which served their purpose of reinforcing their legitimacy as rulers. The preservation of certain laws would have been a strategic move to gain the allegiance of the local populace who were accustomed to those laws. Additionally, the use of local customs could have facilitated the Normans' efforts to maintain control over the newly conquered territories.

However, while there was continuity in some laws, the Normans also introduced significant changes. For example, new laws concerning land tenure emerged, and the role of the monarchy in the legal process was expanded, involving more centralized power than was typical under Anglo-Saxon rule. This duality complicates the interpretation; it shows that while there was an element of continuity, the Normans altered the legal landscape to suit their needs.

Ultimately, Interpretation A is convincing to a degree because it recognizes the adaptation of Anglo-Saxon laws but may downplay the substantial changes implemented by the Normans that transformed the legal system. This aspect must be critically analyzed to form a well-rounded judgment.