Photo AI
Which interpretation gives the more convincing opinion about Rasputin? Explain your answer based on your contextual knowledge and what it says in Interpretations A and B. - AQA - GCSE History - Question 3 - 2022 - Paper 1
Question 3
Which interpretation gives the more convincing opinion about Rasputin? Explain your answer based on your contextual knowledge and what it says in Interpretations A a... show full transcript
Worked Solution & Example Answer:Which interpretation gives the more convincing opinion about Rasputin? Explain your answer based on your contextual knowledge and what it says in Interpretations A and B. - AQA - GCSE History - Question 3 - 2022 - Paper 1
Step 1
Interpretation A: Discuss its Conviction
Answer
Interpretation A presents a view that the aristocrats were alarmed by Rasputin's influence over the Tsarina, particularly as Russia faced the pressures of war. This interpretation suggests that Rasputin's involvement in political decisions exacerbated the already volatile situation. Contextually, this aligns with historical accounts indicating that many in the Russian elite viewed Rasputin as a manipulative figure who undermined their authority and the stability of the monarchy.
Step 2
Interpretation B: Analyze its Perspective
Answer
Interpretation B argues that Rasputin was perceived as a healer and a figure that brought comfort amidst the chaos of war. However, it is essential to assess its credibility; while some supported him for his alleged healing abilities, many were skeptical of his motives and influence. This perspective can be supported by evidence of the backlash he faced, particularly after the assassination in 1916, revealing that his reputation was controversial even among those who initially trusted him.
Step 3
Conclusion: Which Interpretation is More Convincing?
Answer
Overall, Interpretation A is more convincing as it is grounded in the wider socio-political turmoil of Russia at the time. While both interpretations highlight different elements of Rasputin's role, the fears and concerns voiced by the aristocracy in response to Rasputin's influence resonate strongly with the events leading up to the revolution of 1917. The narrative around Rasputin as a destabilizing factor contributes more directly to understanding his impact on the monarchy and subsequent revolutions.