Photo AI
‘There was little change in the nature of warfare in the years c1700–1900’ - Edexcel - GCSE History - Question 6 - 2018 - Paper 1
Question 6
‘There was little change in the nature of warfare in the years c1700–1900’. How far do you agree? Explain your answer. You may use the following in your answer: • ... show full transcript
Worked Solution & Example Answer:‘There was little change in the nature of warfare in the years c1700–1900’ - Edexcel - GCSE History - Question 6 - 2018 - Paper 1
Step 1
the role of cavalry
Answer
The role of cavalry during the 1700-1900 period witnessed both continuities and changes. Initially, cavalry remained crucial in warfare, particularly in traditional battle formations where mobility and shock tactics could influence the outcome. However, as warfare evolved towards the end of the 19th century, the advent of more advanced firearms and artillery diminished the effectiveness of cavalry charges. By the time of the Boer War and World War I, cavalry units were increasingly utilized for reconnaissance and communication rather than direct combat, indicating both a continuity in their existence but a shift in their role.
Step 2
mass production of weapons
Answer
The rise of mass production techniques, particularly with the Industrial Revolution, brought significant change to the nature of warfare. The ability to manufacture weapons at scale meant that armies could be equipped more effectively and rapidly than ever before. This transition, highlighted by innovations such as interchangeable parts and assembly line techniques, allowed for the rapid deployment of advanced weaponry, including rifles and cannons. Bulk production contributed to the overall strategy of nations, where quantity began to compete with quality, fundamentally altering the warfare landscape.
Step 3
Your own information
Answer
Additional factors influencing changes in warfare include the introduction of modern military tactics, the use of trenches during World War I, and the rise of mechanized warfare. The transition from linear tactics to more fluid formations reflected a larger shift in military strategy owing to technological advancements. Moreover, the impact of new communication technologies, such as telegraphs, transformed command and control, allowing for more coordinated military efforts compared to earlier warfare. Thus, while there were elements of continuity in certain aspects of cavalry and battlefield presence, the overall shift towards mechanization, industrialization, and strategy underscores a significant transformation in the nature of warfare between 1700 and 1900.