Photo AI
Question 6
'There has been little progress in dealing with the crime of smuggling in the period c1700-present.' How far do you agree? Explain your answer. You may use the fol... show full transcript
Step 1
Answer
In analyzing the assertion regarding the progress in dealing with smuggling from c1700 to the present, we must consider various dimensions, including public attitudes and the evolution of smuggling gangs.
Public attitudes towards smuggling have historically oscillated. In the early 18th century, smuggling was often viewed as a patriotic act against oppressive taxation. This made it challenging for authorities to combat the crime effectively. As public awareness of the consequences grew, attitudes began to shift, leading to stronger support for enforcement measures in later years. The how far this influences progress in dealing with smuggling structures the response significantly.
The role of smuggling gangs has evolved as well. While they were initially small, decentralized operations, they have now become more organized and sophisticated. This transformation has made law enforcement's task considerably more difficult. Despite advancements in technology and international cooperation, the adaptability of these gangs often outpaces legal efforts. Thus, while there is evidence of attempts to counteract smuggling, the effectiveness has varied over time.
Overall, while there have been advancements in legislative frameworks and enforcement practices, the persistent adaptation of smuggling networks and fluctuating public attitudes suggest that progress has often been limited. The question of whether there has been little progress can thus be agreed upon to a significant extent, as historical and contemporary challenges continue to hinder effective responses to smuggling.
Report Improved Results
Recommend to friends
Students Supported
Questions answered