Photo AI
Study Sources B and C - Edexcel - GCSE History - Question 3 - 2022 - Paper 1
Question 3
Study Sources B and C. How useful are Sources B and C for an enquiry into the reasons why Hitler became Chancellor in 1933? Explain your answer, using Sources B and ... show full transcript
Worked Solution & Example Answer:Study Sources B and C - Edexcel - GCSE History - Question 3 - 2022 - Paper 1
Step 1
How useful are Sources B and C for an enquiry into the reasons why Hitler became Chancellor in 1933?
Answer
To assess the usefulness of Sources B and C, we need to analyze their content, authorship, and perspective on the historical events surrounding Hitler's rise to power.
Source B: This source might present a viewpoint emphasizing the political maneuvering that led to Hitler's appointment. To evaluate its usefulness, we can look at the contextual details provided and consider the author's background and intentions. For instance, if the author was a member of the political elite, their insight could be invaluable, yet potentially biased.
Source C: Alternatively, Source C may focus on public sentiment or the economic conditions that contributed to Hitler's rise. Evaluating this source involves examining how well it illustrates the complexities of public opinion and the impact of economic distress on political decisions.
In terms of context, it's essential to recognize the significance of the economic upheaval in Germany during the early 1930s, which created a fertile ground for extremist political ideologies. Both sources can be considered useful for understanding different facets of the political landscape at the time, though they should not be taken as definitive accounts alone.
Step 2
What is the main difference between these views?
Answer
The main difference between Interpretations 1 and 2 lies in the emphasis placed on various factors contributing to Hitler's appointment as Chancellor.
Interpretation 1 suggests that Hitler's rise was primarily due to decisions made by political elites, highlighting the role of figures in the German political scene who facilitated his appointment for their own interests.
Interpretation 2, on the other hand, emphasizes broader societal factors such as public support for the Nazi Party, suggesting that the populace's desire for change played a critical role.
This distinction shapes how each interpretation views the underlying causes of Hitler's chancellorship: one focuses on elite decision-making, whereas the other underscores popular support.
Step 3
Suggest one reason why Interpretations 1 and 2 give different views about the reasons why Hitler became Chancellor in 1933.
Answer
One reason why Interpretations 1 and 2 differ in their views about Hitler's appointment could be the varying emphasis on the sources from which they derive their information.
Interpretation 1 may prioritize political documents and testimonies from political figures, leading to a conclusion that decisions were driven primarily by elite politics.
Interpretation 2, however, might place more significance on public opinion polls or social movements, suggesting that Grassroots support was instrumental in Hitler's rise.
Thus, the focus and perspective of the authors directly influence the interpretations they present.
Step 4
How do you agree with Interpretation 2 about the reasons why Hitler became Chancellor in 1933?
Answer
I agree with Interpretation 2's assertion that public support for the Nazi Party played an influential role in Hitler's appointment as Chancellor. The socio-economic context of 1933 — marked by the Great Depression — fostered widespread discontent with the Weimar Republic.
This enabled extremist parties like the Nazis to gain traction, as they promised radical change and solutions. Interpretation 2 effectively highlights that Hitler's rise was not solely a product of elite manipulation but also a significant response to the electorate's desires. The interplay between public sentiment and political willing also reveals the complexity of the political landscape during this tumultuous period.