Photo AI
3 (a) How useful are Sources B and C for an enquiry into the reasons for the success of the CCP in the Civil War? Explain your answer, using Sources B and C and your knowledge of the historical context - Edexcel - GCSE History - Question 3 - 2018 - Paper 3
Question 3
3 (a) How useful are Sources B and C for an enquiry into the reasons for the success of the CCP in the Civil War? Explain your answer, using Sources B and C and you... show full transcript
Worked Solution & Example Answer:3 (a) How useful are Sources B and C for an enquiry into the reasons for the success of the CCP in the Civil War? Explain your answer, using Sources B and C and your knowledge of the historical context - Edexcel - GCSE History - Question 3 - 2018 - Paper 3
Step 1
How useful are Sources B and C for an enquiry into the reasons for the success of the CCP in the Civil War?
Answer
To evaluate how useful Sources B and C are for understanding the success of the CCP during the Civil War, we must consider various aspects of each source.
Source B provides a direct insight into the perspectives of CCP leadership post-Civil War, highlighting the people's role and emphasizing the legitimization of Mao's leadership. It serves to show the positive reception of CCP policies, thus demonstrating its utility in understanding public support.
Source C, on the other hand, presents a more critical view, suggesting the limitations faced by the GMD as a means to illuminate why the CCP succeeded. By examining the GMD's failures, this source provides contrasting evidence that enriches our understanding of the period, while also needing to be scrutinized for bias regarding its portrayal of the GMD.
When using both sources in conjunction with historical context, we can deduce that Source B is useful for portraying the success narrative, while Source C is essential for understanding the dynamics of why the GMD could not secure victory. Hence, both sources offer valuable but differing perspectives for a rounded analysis.
Step 2
What is the main difference between these views?
Answer
The main difference between Interpretations 1 and 2 lies in their focus on different causal factors for the success of the CCP in the Civil War.
Interpretation 1 emphasizes the organizational strengths and strategic decisions made by the CCP, including their guerrilla tactics and grassroots mobilization, suggesting a more proactive role in their success.
Conversely, Interpretation 2 argues that the inherent weaknesses of the GMD played a more significant role in the CCP's victory, framing the narrative around the failures of their opponent rather than the capabilities of the CCP. These differing emphases reveal contrasting views on agency and effectiveness in the context of the Civil War.
Step 3
Suggest one reason why Interpretations 1 and 2 give different views about the reasons for the success of the CCP in the Civil War.
Answer
One reason for the differing interpretations is the basis of evidence used by each. Interpretation 1 may rely more on CCP sources and narratives that highlight their successful strategies, whereas Interpretation 2 leans towards analyzing documented failures and crises within the GMD. This contrast in source reliance leads to fundamentally different conclusions about responsibility and causation regarding the CCP's success.
Step 4
How far do you agree with Interpretation 2 about the reasons for the success of the CCP in the Civil War?
Answer
I largely agree with Interpretation 2, as it effectively highlights the key failures of the GMD which contributed to the success of the CCP. The GMD's inability to adapt and the loss of popular support were critical factors that enabled the CCP to capitalize on their weaknesses.
However, while the failures of the GMD are paramount, it is also essential to recognize the strategic innovations employed by the CCP. They showcased not only military prowess but also adept political maneuvering. Thus, while I concur with the assertion of GMD weaknesses, I believe a comprehensive view should also incorporate the proactive measures taken by the CCP, suggesting that both perspectives are significant in understanding the full complexity of the situation.