Photo AI
3 (a) Study Sources B and C - Edexcel - GCSE History - Question 3 - 2021 - Paper 1
Question 3
3 (a) Study Sources B and C. How useful are Sources B and C for an enquiry into support for the Nazi Party in the years 1924-28? Explain your answer, using Sources ... show full transcript
Worked Solution & Example Answer:3 (a) Study Sources B and C - Edexcel - GCSE History - Question 3 - 2021 - Paper 1
Step 1
How useful are Sources B and C for an enquiry into support for the Nazi Party in the years 1924-28?
Answer
To evaluate the usefulness of Sources B and C, we must consider their content, provenance, and the historical context.
Source B highlights the poor electoral performance of the Nazis in 1928 and suggests that public support was limited during this period. This perspective provides insight into the lack of popularity of the Nazi Party just before the rise to power. However, it is crucial to acknowledge the author's background; as an American journalist, their viewpoint might be influenced by an external perspective on German politics.
Source C, contrastingly, focuses on the political turmoil of the period and outlines significant rallies and events organized by the Nazis that illustrated their attempts to gain popularity. This source suggests that while support was fluctuating, activities during the late 1920s laid groundwork that would benefit them later.
In conclusion, both sources are useful in illustrating different aspects of support for the Nazi Party, but should be critically assessed for their limitations and potential biases due to the authors' backgrounds.
Step 2
What is the main difference between these views?
Answer
The main difference between Interpretations 1 and 2 lies in their focus regarding the Nazi Party's support.
Interpretation 1 emphasizes the efforts made by the Nazis to garner support, suggesting that they had strategies in place that engaged many people, despite their challenges. In contrast, Interpretation 2 posits that the support was actually limited and that the methods employed by the Nazis were not as effective as portrayed.
Thus, the key distinction is one of perspective: Interpretation 1 views the party as actively generating support, while Interpretation 2 argues that their support was scarce and dependent on specific circumstances.
Step 3
Suggest one reason why Interpretations 1 and 2 give different views about support for the Nazi Party in the years 1924-28.
Answer
One reason for the differing views in Interpretations 1 and 2 could stem from the authors' emphasis on different aspects of the Nazi Party's operations.
Interpretation 1 highlights the proactive measures taken by the Nazis to engage the electorate, illustrating that they were strategically focusing on rallies and propaganda. On the other hand, Interpretation 2 reflects a skepticism regarding the effectiveness of these efforts, pointing to the limited success in garnering widespread support. This divergence suggests a contrast in how the authors interpret the impact and efficacy of the Nazi strategies based on the surrounding political climate.
Step 4
How do you agree with Interpretation 2 about support for the Nazi Party in the years 1924-28?
Answer
I agree with Interpretation 2, which argues that support for the Nazi Party was quite limited during the years 1924-28, primarily due to the political and economic stability of the Weimar Republic at that time.
While there were moments of activity from the Nazi Party, such as rallies and campaigns, these did not translate into significant electoral gains. The political landscape was competitive, and many voters were disillusioned with extremist parties, including the Nazis, due to their radical views and the historical context of post-World War I Germany.
Furthermore, the Great Depression's impact in 1929 would later drive more unstable voting conditions, allowing the Nazis to leverage public discontent, which is absent from the earlier years. Hence, while the groundwork was laid during 1924-28, the actual support remained marginal.