A train travelled along a track in 110 minutes, correct to the nearest 5 minutes - Edexcel - GCSE Maths - Question 17 - 2017 - Paper 3
Question 17
A train travelled along a track in 110 minutes, correct to the nearest 5 minutes.
He assumes that the track has been measured correct to the nearest 10 km.
(a) Coul... show full transcript
Worked Solution & Example Answer:A train travelled along a track in 110 minutes, correct to the nearest 5 minutes - Edexcel - GCSE Maths - Question 17 - 2017 - Paper 3
Step 1
Could the average speed of the train have been greater than 160 km/h?
96%
114 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
To determine the average speed of the train, we can use the formula for speed:
v = \frac{d}{t}$$
where:
- $v$ is the average speed,
- $d$ is the distance traveled,
- $t$ is the time taken.
From the information given:
- Time, $t = 110$ minutes = $\frac{110}{60}$ hours = $\frac{11}{6}$ hours.
- Assuming the longest possible distance for the given track measurement to the nearest 10 km:
- If the track length is measured at its upper limit, the actual distance is $270 km + 5 km = 275 km$.
- Therefore, the average speed can be calculated as:
Since 150km/h is less than 160km/h, we conclude that the average speed of the train could not have been greater than 160km/h.
Step 2
Explain how this could affect your decision in part (a).
99%
104 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
If the track was measured to the nearest 5 km, this gives a potential distance for the track of anywhere between:
Lower limit: 270km−2.5km=267.5km
Upper limit: 270km+2.5km=272.5km
Thus the average speed could be recalculated using these limits:
Using the upper limit:
v=611 hours272.5 km=11272.5×6=148.36 km/h
Using the lower limit:
v=611 hours267.5 km=11267.5×6=146.36 km/h
In conclusion, measuring the track to the nearest 5 km means the average speed of the train can indeed be below 160km/h, depending on the actual distance traveled, reinforcing that the initial assumption made in part (a) is valid but based on incorrect data.