Analyse religious responses to custodial sentences. - Scottish Highers Religious Moral and Philosophical Studies - Question 13 - 2019

Religious responses to custodial sentences vary significantly across different faiths.

Christianity: Many Christian teachings advocate for rehabilitation rather than punishment. The concept of restorative justice is prevalent, where the focus is on reconciling offenders with victims and the community. This is often supported by Biblical teachings that emphasize forgiveness and compassion, urging Christians to understand the circumstances surrounding individual offenses.

Islam: In Islam, justice is seen as a collective responsibility. The Quran discusses the importance of repentance and reform, suggesting that custodial sentences should be balanced with the opportunity for the offender to reform and reunite with society.

Judaism: Jewish law also considers custodial sentences as a necessary measure for societal protection, yet it emphasizes the importance of mercy and forgiveness. The concept of ‘Teshuva’ or repentance is significant, suggesting that offenders should be given a chance to repent and amend their actions.

In general, many religious viewpoints advocate for a more compassionate approach to justice, where the focus lies not solely on punishment but on the potential for rehabilitation and the moral obligation to seek understanding.