20.1.2 The independent nature of the Supreme Court.

The Independent Nature of the Supreme Court

Definition of Judicial Independence

---

Key Features Ensuring Judicial Independence

Lifetime Appointments

Protection of Salaries

The Constitution ensures that the salaries of Supreme Court Justices cannot be reduced during their time in office. This protection guards against economic manipulation by the other branches of government, reinforcing the independence of the judiciary by preventing any financial leverage that could influence a justice's decisions.

Senate Confirmation of Nominees

While the President has the power to nominate justices to the Supreme Court, the Senate must confirm these nominees. This process ensures that justices are vetted by both the executive and legislative branches, promoting a judiciary that is nonpartisan and qualified. The Senate's role in confirmation acts as a check to prevent any single branch of government from wielding unchecked power. An example of this check in action was when President George W. Bush's nomination of Harriet Miers, a personal friend with no judicial experience, faced significant opposition and was eventually withdrawn.

Control Over Case Selection

The Supreme Court has the authority to choose which cases it hears, a process known as certiorari. This allows the Court to focus on significant constitutional issues and avoid being overwhelmed by a large number of less important cases. By controlling its docket, the Court can maintain its independence by addressing only those cases that have broad legal implications or involve fundamental constitutional principles.

Judicial Review

One of the most significant powers of the Supreme Court is judicial review, the ability to invalidate laws and executive actions that are deemed unconstitutional. This power is a critical check on the other branches of government, reinforcing the Court's role as an independent arbiter. Judicial review ensures that the actions of the legislative and executive branches do not overstep constitutional boundaries.

Separation of Personnel

The principle of separation of powers in the U.S. government ensures that justices do not have conflicts of interest arising from political stances or affiliations. Justices are expected to be impartial, focusing solely on the law and the Constitution in their decisions. This separation helps to maintain the independence of the judiciary.

---

Challenges to Judicial Independence

Increasing Politicization

Despite the mechanisms in place to ensure judicial independence, the Supreme Court has become increasingly politicized, with Presidents often selecting justices based on their perceived voting history or ideological leanings. This politicization is evident in the current composition of the Court, which has a 6-3 conservative majority. Some argue that this was part of President Donald Trump's broader strategy to sway the Court in a conservative direction, potentially influencing decisions on key issues like Roe v. Wade.

Accountability Concerns

The lifetime appointment of justices raises concerns about accountability. Once appointed, justices are not directly accountable to the public, which can lead to concerns that they might become detached from public opinion or resistant to evolving social norms. However, justices are expected to root their decisions in the Constitution and must provide detailed explanations in dissenting and concurring opinions, which helps to maintain some level of accountability.

Unpredictability of Justices

Despite efforts to select ideologically aligned justices, their decisions can be unpredictable. For instance, George H.W. Bush's nominee David Souter, initially believed to be a conservative, frequently sided with the liberal wing of the Court, illustrating that justices may not always conform to the expectations of the Presidents who appoint them.

---

Importance of Judicial Independence

Judicial independence is vital for the proper functioning of the U.S. legal system. It ensures that the Supreme Court can operate as a neutral arbiter, free from undue influence by the other branches of government or external pressures. This independence is crucial for protecting the rights and liberties of individuals, maintaining the rule of law, and preventing any single branch of government from becoming too powerful. The mechanisms in place, such as lifetime appointments, protection of salaries, and judicial review, are designed to uphold this independence, even in the face of challenges such as increasing politicization and accountability concerns.