Economic and social developments Simplified Revision Notes for A-Level Edexcel History
Revision notes with simplified explanations to understand Economic and social developments quickly and effectively.
Learn about The Stalinist dictatorship and reaction 1941–1964 for your A-Level History Exam. This Revision Note includes a summary of The Stalinist dictatorship and reaction 1941–1964 for easy recall in your History exam
230+ students studying
The Stalinist dictatorship and reaction 1941–1964 Quizzes
Test your knowledge with quizzes.
The Stalinist dictatorship and reaction 1941–1964 Flashcards
Practice with bite-sized questions.
The Stalinist dictatorship and reaction 1941–1964 Questions by Topic
Prepare with real exam question.
Economic and social developments
📌 Social developments
De-Stalinisation and The Secret Speech
The term de-Stalinisation is problematic
Not used in Soviet Era Russia at all
'Overcoming/exposure of the cult of personality
De-Stalinisation used more widely in the West
Polly Jones: Sounds too final, in reality there was a 'thaw'
Anne Applebaum: Reforms took two steps forwards and one step back, sometimes three steps back
From 1953 there was a period of silent de Stalinisation
Gulag inmates released
Eventually there had to be a public acknowledgement that there was a rolling back of Stalin's policies
Khrushchev is believed to have had a naïve belief that once rid of the Stalinist stain socialism will become even more widely supported
De-Stalinization
December 1955 commission found:
Of 1,902,635 Party officials arrested 1935-40, 688,503 were shot
All plots against Stalin were fabricated
Stalin was personally responsible for directing the torture resulting in the forced confessions
Khrushchev argued that 'We've got to have the courage to tell the truth'
Molotov however in particular wanted the Party to see Stalin as 'the great continuer of Lenin's work'
Khrushchev was a latecomer to the Politburo whereas Molotov et al. were long term members
So they implicated in the terror of Stalinism more clearly
📌 What were Khrushchev's motives?
Restoration of faith in the Party and save it from self-implosion
Liberate the Party from fear of repression, making it more efficient and therefore successful
Avoid more radical debate within the Party
Get ahead of his leadership rivals
They were all implicated in the Stalinist terror, suggesting they would continue such practices
The Speech – 'On the cult of personality and its consequences'
Delivered at an unscheduled 'secret' session, lasted four hours with an intermission
He avoided attacking Stalin pre- 1934 and did not attack the ideology of Leninist-Marxism
He didn't address the NKVD order 0047 (which he helped facilitate)
He attacked the Cult of Personality under Stalin and cited how Stalin was guilty of self-glorification while maintaining a front of modesty. He attacked Stalin's attacks on loyal Party members and use of needless violence
Criticised the role of the NKVD in the purges especially the use of torture to extract confessions
'beat, beat and once again beat' were Stalin's instructions to the NKVD to elicit confessions
Highlighted Stalin as being essentially against the Party
Read out Lenin's testament emphasising the part criticising Stalin and letters about Stalin's rudeness to Krupskaya to demonstrate Lenin's doubts about him
Suggested how Stalin might have been complicit in the murder of Kirov
Criticised the performance of Stalin in the war, held him responsible for the disasters of 1941
Denounced the mass deportations of the 'punished peoples' during the war as contrary not only to Marxism-Leninism but also to common sense
Demonstrated that Stalin's 'grave abuse of power' continued after the war with the purge of the Leningrad Party and the Doctor's Plot
Told the delegates that Stalin apparently had plans to destroy old members of the Politburo 'to hide the shameful acts we are now reporting'
Khrushchev's hypocrisy
Khrushchev's hypocrisy
Under Khrushchev's leadership the implementation of NKVD order 0047 was very significant in both Moscow and Ukraine
Overfulfilled his quota
Bragged to Stalin about the sheer numbers
Only 10/146 Party Secretaries survived in the Moscow region
Obvious defence: to not act would have sealed his own death
Taubman argues that Khrushchev was in denial until the very end of his complicity in such terror
Around 25 million people were exposed to the transcript of The Secret Speech
Consequences at home
In Hosking's words, Khrushchev had 'torn the veil away from the inner sanctum and revealed a blood-stained torture chamber'
The party was thrown into confusion
Some blamed the leaders for failing to speak out earlier
Others criticised Khrushchev for raising all these questions
At Moscow State University, students boycotted the canteen, notorious for its bad food
It was a semi-intentional re-enactment of the revolt on the battleship Potemkin in 1905
In schools, students tore Stalin's portraits off the walls and trampled them underfoot
At public meetings to discuss the speech Stalin was condemned as an 'enemy of the people'
Calls for multi-party elections and real rights and freedoms to prevent the Terror from happening again
The response was well beyond Khrushchev's expectations
Was worried by the Party's more radical critics
Were expelled from the Party and pilloried in the press as 'rotten elements'
Khrushchev had to perform a balancing act
This meant his de-Stalinisation was marked by retreats as well as advances
Freeing of political prisoners accelerated
In the three years following the speech 7000 were rehabilitated
In the 10 months that followed 617,000 were rehabilitated
Consequences outside the USSR
In communist countries of Eastern Europe an attack on Stalin's post-war conduct had a de-stabilising impact
They had only been under communist rule since 1945
A strike brought about a change of government in Poland
In Hungary, in October 1956 there was a full-blown uprising
Consequences outside the USSR
Then the new Hungarian Prime Minister denounced the Warsaw Pact and declared Hungary's neutrality
At first Soviet troops complied with the demand for them to leave
This was too much for Khrushchev
He decided to crush the uprising
20,000 Hungarian casualties
Turbulence inside the Warsaw Pact strengthened the position of those in the Presidium who were critical of Khrushchev's de-Stalinisation
In China, Mao Zedong was shocked by the betrayal of Stalin
Later denounced Khrushchev as a 'revisionist' for watering down the tough revolutionary doctrine of Bolshevism
Never forgave Khrushchev for not revealing to him what he intended to do beforehand
Longer Term consequences and Historiography
Figes argues the Soviet system never really recovered from the crisis of confidence created by the speech: 'The speech changed everything. It was the moment when the Party lost authority, unity and self-belief. It was the beginning of the end.'
For the first time the Party was admitting it was wrong and in a catastrophic way
Many of his colleagues never forgave Khrushchev for the speech
Many years later in 1984 when the Politburo decided to readmit Molotov to the Party, it reaffirmed its
hostility to Khrushchev
According to Dmitrii Ustinov the then Defence Minister 'no other enemy brough us as much harm'
📌 Economic changes
📌 How and with what success did Khrushchev try to reform the Soviet Economy?
The Economy under Khrushchev
Compared to Stalin, Khrushchev was much more hands on with the economy
Following the defeat of Malenkov, Khrushchev aimed to boost the production of consumer goods and increase food yields
Problems he found:
Low productivity
Low livestock levels
Low farmer incomes and low government procurement prices
High taxes on private plots discouraged investment and production
Because of his Ukrainian background, he felt he was a man of the people
Wanted to be more involved
Regarded himself as the agricultural expert – did not mean he knew anything about farming
A first honest assessment of the agricultural sector since collectivisation
Solutions
State procurement prices were increased
Taxes were cut
Investment in private and collective farms and equipment was raised
The Virgin Lands campaign
The Virgin Lands Campaign
Khrushchev loved contact with peasants and workers
Huge operation designed to plough up a vast tract of virgin and fallow land
Kazakhstan, the Urals and Siberia
Grain cultivation
More than 300,000 Komsomol volunteers were mobilised to settle and cultivate the areas
By 1959: 35.9 million acres had been cultivated
Would be joined by even larger groups of students, soldiers and truck and combine-drivers
They were transported on a seasonal basis
Conditions were primitive
Harsh climate
Run like a military campaign with emphasis on speed, much like the Five-Year Plans
Much publicity
Little listening to advice
Harvest in 1956 was announced as a great victory, it was the largest in Soviet history
Over 125 million tons of grain produced came from the new regions, results never reached that again
By the early 1960s reliance on single-crop cultivation had taken its toll on the fertility of the soil
Failure to adopt anti-erosion measures led to millions of tons of topsoil simply blowing away
1960: this happened to 13,000 square miles of land
By 1963 the grain harvest was disastrous
Virgin Lands produced their smallest crop for years
The Maize Obsession
Khrushchev believed he had solved both the grain problem and the fodder problem
With the VL campaign underway, maize could be grown in traditional grain-producing areas
It would provide cattle-feed and revive meat and dairy farming
He wanted it grown everywhere
Claimed "corn can produce high yields in all areas of our country" and "corn is unequalled by any other crop"
While it is valuable in Ukraine, barely ripens elsewhere
85 million acres were planted however only about one-sixth was harvested ripe
Khrushchev claimed in 1957 that the USSR would catch up with the USA in per capita meat output by 1960, this required a threefold increase.
One provincial Party boss met this aim, this was much praised by Khrushchev however it had only been achieved by the slaughter of dairy cattle, rustling, false accounting of all sorts. The Party Boss later shot himself.
One-sixth of the vaunted promise was delivered the following year
Ultimately this was a huge waste of man-hours – it was a bigger failure than the VL campaign
Other Agricultural Changes
MTS were abolished in 1958
They had maintained and hired out machinery
Now the Kolkhozy had to buy the machinery and had to pay too much too quickly and there was nowhere to store them
Mechanics from the former MTS tended to go to the towns where living standards were higher so there was not enough expertise to maintain or repair machinery
Left to rust away
Restricted size of private plots
Put pressure on peasants to sell their cows to the Kolkhoz
Khrushchev interfered too much with different forced campaigns
Often with little regard
Reorganised continually
Industry
The Space programme
The Soviet Union under Khrushchev took the lead in space research and exploration
August 1957 saw the first successful test of an inter-continental ballistic missile
Two months later that rocket was used to launch the first satellite, Sputnik, into space
In 1961, Yuri Gagarin became the first man in space
Huge boost to Soviet prestige
Coupled with Khrushchev's boasting about its military rocketry
This led the outside world to overestimate Soviet progress
There was no 'missile gap' with the United States in favour of the Soviet Union
The Seven-Year Plan
Khrushchev introduced a Seven-Year Plan covering the years 1959-65
Wanted rapid expansion of the chemical industry to provide more mineral fertilisers for agriculture
Large investment in oil and natural gas
Focus on investment in areas east of the Urals
By 1961 Khrushchev announced some upward amendments
Was always in a hurry and was now buoyed up by Soviet Space exploits
Overall industrial progress was impressive
Major increase in consumer goods
Soaring expenses of the space and missile programme and increased military expenditure placed heavy strain on scarce skills and specialist equipment
Growth rates suffered
In 1963/1964 growth rates fell to the lowest in peacetime since planning began
infoNote
Khrushchev's Seven-Year Plan (1959-65): Focused on rapid industrial expansion, especially in chemicals and oil, with a shift to the east of the Urals. The plan initially boosted industrial progress and consumer goods, spurred by Soviet space achievements. However, soaring costs in the space, missile, and military sectors strained resources, leading to a significant drop in growth rates by 1963-64—the lowest in peacetime since Soviet planning began.
Khrushchev's Reorganisations
Had clear political motives
Was hoped they would avoid waste and bring decision-making nearer the point of
production
Stalinist command economy concentrated great power in the central gov ministries
This was where main Presidium had power bases
Khrushchev's devolution of powers to the republics strengthened Party (rather than ministry) control
Also increased his power and influence
Between 1954 & 55: about 11,000 enterprises transferred from central to republican control
1956: factories run by twelve central governmental ministries were placed under the jurisdiction of republican governments
May 1957: 105 regional economic councils were established to take the place of the central economic ministries
This was one of the factors that stirred up Khrushchev's Presidium opponents to challenge him
Overcame his opponents
Regional economic councils were abolished soon after Khrushchev was ousted
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view the full note, or log in if you already have an account!
500K+ Students Use These Powerful Tools to Master Economic and social developments For their A-Level Exams.
Enhance your understanding with flashcards, quizzes, and exams—designed to help you grasp key concepts, reinforce learning, and master any topic with confidence!