Political authority and attempts at reform Simplified Revision Notes for A-Level Edexcel History
Revision notes with simplified explanations to understand Political authority and attempts at reform quickly and effectively.
Learn about Trying to preserve autocracy 1855–1894 for your A-Level History Exam. This Revision Note includes a summary of Trying to preserve autocracy 1855–1894 for easy recall in your History exam
242+ students studying
Trying to preserve autocracy 1855–1894 Quizzes
Test your knowledge with quizzes.
Trying to preserve autocracy 1855–1894 Flashcards
Practice with bite-sized questions.
Trying to preserve autocracy 1855–1894 Questions by Topic
Prepare with real exam question.
Political authority and attempts at reform
📌 Alexander II
The Emancipation of the Serfs – 1861
The moral case
Members of the royal family dating from 1762 (Catherine the Great) considered serfdom to be morally and ethically wrong.
Nicholas I also believed and admitted serfdom was 'an evil, palpable and obvious to all'
Enlightened Nobles and liberal state officials had come to accept that it was wrong to own someone like a possession or an object
The condition of peasants needed to be improved
A radical intelligentsia was growing – they opposed serfdom
Alexander II
infoNote
Serfdom: However, the majority of nobles believed the abolishment of serfdom would damage the Russian state, as well as their own livelihoods.
The Serfs made up 84% of the population. They were tied to the locality and worked for their Noble. Their lives were controlled by the Nobility. Serfs were property and not people. Around 7% served as domestics rather than farm labourers.
Risk of Revolt
There had been serious peasant revolts in the past and disturbances were increasing (since the 1840s)
There was a significant spike in disturbances between 1857 and 1859
Alexander believed it was better to abolish serfdom from the higher powers instead of waiting for it to abolish itself from below
He had been unsettled by the 1848 revolutions in Europe
The army was made up mainly of peasants, meaning it could be very difficult for the government to contain a major uprising
The Tsar ordered weekly reports on the mood of the peasantry from December 1857
However the main sources of data are unreliable Tsarist police records, therefore some historians believe the scale of peasant unrest had been exaggerated
Some nobles feared major reform might provoke a revolt as the peasants may see it as a sign of weakness or might be disappointed by the reform
The Crimean War
The Crimean War drew attention to the state of the army, which was comprised of mainly peasants (many were serfs)
They were compulsorily enlisted for periods of up to 25 years, and at the end of that (if they survived) they were given freedom
Military reformers believed Russia needed a smaller, better trained army with a reserve, like in other European countries
This meant a shorter conscription sentence for peasants before being sent on to the reserve
This would mean thousands of freed serfs with military training would be released back home
Officials became convinced that military reform could only be carried out once serfdom was abolished
There was also the question of how long serfs would remain loyal if their living conditions did not improve
Economic reasons
If the Russian economy were to advance, many officials believed serfdom should be abolished
Some officials accepted the argument that free labour was more productive than forced labour
Furthermore, they believed forced labour impoverished the population and stopped domestic demand growth, which was essential for economic growth
They believed a free labour market was needed, where peasants could move around to where they could be most productive in agriculture or industry Features and the impact of the emancipation on:
Former Serfs:
Now legally free
Could marry who they liked, travel, vote in local elections and trade freely
Could not be sold or sent to other estates
Only applied to privately owned serfs – state serfs would receive freedom in 1866
They would have land to go with their freedom
They were allowed to keep their houses and the land immediately around it but had to buy the other land they worked on at the time of the emancipation
The Mir was responsible for the collection of redemption payments, their power was strengthened.
The Nobility:
Would continue to play a role in policing
They felt they had not been compensated for the loss of their rights over the serfs - They lost power, status, and influence
Much of the money paid to the nobles went to pay off existing debts and mortgages
Nobles who could not afford or did not want to make the adaptation to hired labour moved to towns and rented out their land, or went to live in the cities and became absentee landlords - Some sold up over the years
Features and the impact of the emancipation on:
The Nobility:
Would continue to play a role in policing
They felt they had not been compensated for the loss of their rights over the serfs - They lost power, status, and influence
Much of the money paid to the nobles went to pay off existing debts and mortgages
Nobles who could not afford or did not want to make the adaptation to hired labour moved to towns and rented out their land, or went to live in the cities and became absentee landlord and some sold up over the years
From 1862 to 1905 their landholdings fell from 87 million to 50 million desyatiny (Russian measurement of land, equivalent to 2.7 acres)
Some wanted gentry representatives to form a national commission to prevent bureaucrats riding roughshod over their interests again, and some wanted elected representatives from all over Russia Peasants (the former Serfs):
The Serfs:
Most peasants as a result had to work for much of the year as hired labourers on the Noble's remaining land - They felt they had been cheated as they still didn't outright own the land and had to pay for it over 49 years- This caused deep resentment
There were over 1,000 disturbances during 1861, one of which involved 10,000 peasants
The army had to be brought in to restore order in over 30 estates
This diminished quickly and most got on with the emancipation process
However resentment did not diminish, and peasants remained a segregated class
infoNote
Kulaks were better-off peasants who owned animals and hired labour from their poorer peasant neighbours.
infoNote
Overall, although the abolishment of Serfdom was a successful move in making Tsarist Russia more ethical and humane, and was a step in the right direction, the policy itself was not a well-liked policy – most peasants resented the reforms and believed they had been cheated. Revolts and disturbances were frequent following the years after 1861. The legal rights of serfs and peasants were there, but the economic ones were apparently theoretical. Nobles benefitted more than the peasants – they still owned two thirds of the land and peasants only had one third.
Local Government reform – 1864
Introduced self-governed councils at provincial and district levels
Councils were to be elected by nobles, town dwellers and peasants
Nobles made up 40% of district councils and 70% of Provincial councils (to make up for the losses they suffered due to the emancipation)
Had general responsibilities for health, education, road & bridge maintenance, and local economic affairs - Had to raise small taxes for these improvements
Elected for three years
Judicial reforms – 1864
Established a new system of civil and criminal courts based on concepts of Western courts
Provided justice at lower levels and courts were set up for more serious offences
The system was simplified with fewer courts and each province had a court
Judges were paid good salaries and could not be removed from office
Civil and criminal courts were open to the public and the proceedings were reported
Jury trials were introduced to more serious cases
A system of Justices of the Peace was set up (elected by the district council)
Where offences only concerned peasants, separate village courts were used
infoNote
Judicial Reforms Overview: A new system of civil and criminal courts was established, inspired by Western models, to ensure justice at all levels. The structure was simplified with each province having its own court, and judges were well-compensated with job security. Public trials and jury systems were introduced for serious cases, enhancing transparency. Justices of the Peace, elected by district councils, handled local matters, while village courts managed peasant-specific issues, creating a more accessible and organized judicial system.
Military reforms – 1861 – 81
Universal conscription was introduced
All social classes were liable to sign up for the army at the age of 21
This caused deep resentment amongst the nobility who did not want their children mixing with lower classes.
The standard length of military service was decreased to 15 years – six in active service and nine in reserve -administration was reorganised into 25 districts
Military colleges were established and promotion was made more open to other classes
Broader education was provided
Modern rifles and artillery were introduced but this was a slow process
Reduction in the number of offences that required corporal punishment
Flogging was abolished, and remaining soldiers were now housed in barracks
Education reforms – 1863 – 64
During the first decade of Alexander's reign, the number of pupils doubled
New primary schools were built and were open to all classes
Between 1856 and 1878 the number of primary schools increased from 8000 to nearly 25000 with 1 million pupils in attendance
Secondary schools also opened to all classes
The curriculum was extended and now included a wider range of subjects
Universities governed themselves
Women could attend courses but not take degrees
Enlightened, liberal-thinking professors were appointed
Students were drawn from wider social groups
Censorship
newspapers and books no longer had to submit to prior censorship
newspapers could discuss government policy
editors were given more freedom
📌 Alexander III
Alexander III of Russia
Counter Reforms
Emergency measures:1881, Statute of State Security was passed
Prohibited gatherings of more than 12 people
Prosecuted any individual for political crimes
Introduced emergency police rule where public order was threatened
Set up special courts outside the legal system
Allowed the government to close schools, universities, and newspapers
The minister of the interior, provincial governors and police chiefs could do what they wanted
These 'temporary' measures stayed in place until 1917
Initiated a period of repression
Control
1881 Okhrana Secret Police established
The decree of 1882 allowed police to declare any citizen subject to surveillance
Minister of the Interior, Tolstoy, decided he wanted government-appointed officials to directly control peasant and village communes
Members of the gentry were chosen as land captains or commandants to control rural areas
These land captains could overrule district courts and were deeply resented by peasants
Censorship was tightened even further
Publications criticising the regime could be suspended
Editors could be banned from publishing anything else
Education
In 1884 University statute brought in strict controls on the universities
Reduced their autonomy and student freedom
Uni staff were appointed by the Minister of Education
Uni courses for women were closed
Church was given more control over primary education
Fees in secondary schools raised to exclude students from lower classes - The percentage of children of nobles and officials rose considerably
Local Government
1890 Zemstva Act reduced independence of local governments and their control became more centralised
Put under the Minister of Interior to provincial governors could amend their decisions
Central gov interfered with local initiatives
The system to elect members was changed in favour of landowners
Peasant representation was reduced
However, the Zemstva continued their improvement programme. This included building hospitals and roads
They played a key role in alleviating the effects of the 1891-92 famine
In 1892 the Municipal Government Act did the same to Municipal councils
The number of eligible voters was reduced drastically, favoured richer property owners, E.g. in Moscow and St Petersburg only 0.7% of the population could vote
infoNote
The 1890 Zemstva Act drastically limited local governments' freedom by centralizing control under the Minister of Interior. Provincial governors may revise zemstva rulings, and the voting system was changed to favour landowners, lowering peasant representation. Despite this, the zemstva continued their efforts, such as building hospitals and roads, and played an important part in alleviating the 1891-92 famine. Similarly, the 1892 Municipal Government Act limited municipal councils' freedom. It significantly lowered the number of eligible voters, favouring wealthy property owners, with barely 0.7% of the population in cities such as Moscow and St. Petersburg able to vote.
Legal
wanted to regain power passed to the judicial system
Reduced scope of offences subject to the full rigours of the system
Court martials were used to try sensitive cases to avoid publicity
The Minister of justice could order a trial to be held in private
Crimes against the state could be heard in special courts without a jury
Judges lost their security of tenure
Many judges were appointed directly from the Ministry of Justice
The Justices of the Peace was abolished
Their judicial functions were passed onto the land captains
Repression
Following Alexander II's assassination, a nationwide police offensive arrested 10,000 people
There was a crackdown on anybody connected with terrorist or revolutionary activities
The Okhrana was a sinister and effective organisation, thousands of informers and agents were recruited, most post offices had a room where mail was read, and many innocent people suspected of being a danger to the state were arrested and exiled
The tightened censorship laws made it difficult to voice a dissident opinion
Despite this, revolutionary parties still sprung up, but most were short lived
The People's Will was greatly weakened and never really recovered
Every terrorist act was followed by a wave of arrests
Violence was kept under control, but gov. officials became more convinced terrorists were everywhere
One plot to assassinate Alexander III involved a young man named Alexander Ulyanov
He and four others were hanged. After that, his younger brother, Vladimir, later became known as Lenin
📌 More progressive policies
Economic development
Alexander supported successful finance ministers (Bunge, Vyshnegradsky, Witte)
Lay down the basis for future development
Created the industrial spurt of the 1890s
Railway building
Encouraging foreign investment
Tariff protection for fledgling industries
Building up gold reserves
Exporting grain to pay for foreign imports and to pay interest on foreign loans
Bunge introduced measures between 1882 and 1897
He improved living and working conditions for peasants and the increasing number of workers
Vyshnegradsky ramped up taxes and tariffs to force the peasants to sell more grain
Grain exports increased but the peasants suffered
In 1891 harvest failures in the Volga region caused a massive famine
Vyshnegradsky later increased indirect taxes so the overall tax burden on peasants didn't change much
1883: The Peasants Land Bank set up to help peasants buy land
1885: The Nobles' land bank was established, lending money at low interest rates to nobles so they could pay off debts or invest in land
Measures taken to improve workers' lives had limited impact
Laws were passed that reduced child labour, working hours for women at night, fines for workers
Compulsory education was provided to younger factory children
A factory inspectorate was established to monitor living and working conditions
infoNote
Summary:
Looking at Alexander III, I now believe that Alexander II's reforms had a more positive impact on the people of Russia as he did make society more equal – Alexander III rejected all these reforms and put everything back to the start again, increasing repression and censorship, which therefore increased the want for revolution, as people would be getting tired of going back and forth. Alexander II did seem to bring some sort of peace to Russia during his reign, whereas Alexander III mostly repressed society by establishing the secret police, reducing peasant input in government, and increasing censorship
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view the full note, or log in if you already have an account!
500K+ Students Use These Powerful Tools to Master Political authority and attempts at reform For their A-Level Exams.
Enhance your understanding with flashcards, quizzes, and exams—designed to help you grasp key concepts, reinforce learning, and master any topic with confidence!
380 flashcards
Flashcards on Political authority and attempts at reform