Modern Liberalism: Reaction to Free-Market Capitalism and Expanded Freedom Simplified Revision Notes for A-Level Edexcel Politics
Revision notes with simplified explanations to understand Modern Liberalism: Reaction to Free-Market Capitalism and Expanded Freedom quickly and effectively.
Learn about Differing views and tensions within liberalism for your A-Level Politics Exam. This Revision Note includes a summary of Differing views and tensions within liberalism for easy recall in your Politics exam
224+ students studying
Differing views and tensions within liberalism Quizzes
Test your knowledge with quizzes.
Differing views and tensions within liberalism Flashcards
Practice with bite-sized questions.
Differing views and tensions within liberalism Questions by Topic
Prepare with real exam question.
6.2.2 Modern Liberalism: Reaction to Free-Market Capitalism and Expanded Freedom
History of Modern Liberalism
Modern liberalism developed in the late 19th and early 20th centuries as a response to the social and economic challenges of industrialization. While still valuing individual liberty, modern liberals believe that the state has a role in ensuring social justice and addressing the inequalities and failures of the free market.
The Impact of Industrialisation
Challenges of Industrialisation
infoNote
Industrialisation brought about massive wealth expansion for some but also spread slums, poverty, ignorance, and disease. Social inequality became more pronounced as a growing industrial working class faced low pay, poor employment conditions, and degrading living standards.
Revised Beliefs
Modern liberals found it difficult to maintain the belief that industrial capitalism had brought general prosperity and liberty for all. They began to revise the early liberal expectation that the unrestrained pursuit of self-interest produced a socially just society.
Economic individualism came under attack, and liberals rethought their attitude towards the state. The minimal state of classical theory was deemed incapable of rectifying injustices and inequalities. Modern liberals thus supported the development of an interventionist or enabling state.
Criticism and Evolution
Classical liberals have argued that modern liberals broke from the principles of earlier liberalism, abandoning individualism for collectivism. However, modern liberals argue they built upon, rather than betrayed, classical liberalism, representing a marriage between new and old liberalism, embodying ideological and theoretical tensions, notably over the role of the state.
Positive Freedom
Concept of Altruism
infoNote
Modern liberals believe individuals have the capacity for altruism and possess social responsibilities beyond mere individual responsibilities. They are linked by ties of caring and empathy, influenced by socialist ideas emphasizing the cooperative nature of humanity.
Positive vs. Negative Freedom
Negative freedom acknowledges only legal and physical constraints on liberty. Positive freedom, however, recognizes that liberty may also be threatened by social disadvantage and inequality. It involves the ability of individuals to develop and attain their potential, skills, knowledge, and fulfillment.
By protecting individualism from social evils, the state can expand freedom rather than merely diminishing it. Modern liberals advocate for an enabling state that exercises a broad range of social and economic responsibilities.
Self-Reliant Individuals
Modern liberals share the classical liberal preference for self-reliant individuals who take responsibility for their own lives, but they recognize that this can only be achieved if social conditions are conducive to it.
Economic Development
Managing the Economy
20th-century western governments sought to deliver prosperity by 'managing' their economies, rejecting the classical liberal belief in a self-regulating free market and the doctrine of laissez-faire.
The abandonment of laissez-faire arose due to the increasing complexity of industrial capitalist economies and their failure to guarantee general prosperity if left unregulated.
Keynesian Economics
infoNote
John Maynard Keynes challenged classical economic thinking, arguing against the belief in a self-regulating market. He proposed that the level of economic activity, and thus employment, is determined by aggregate demand in the economy.
Keynes suggested that governments could 'manage' their economies by influencing aggregate demand. Government spending acts as an 'injection' of demand into the economy, while taxation is a 'withdrawal' that reduces aggregate demand and dampens economic activity.
State Intervention and Economic Management
Role of Government
Modern liberals advocate for active state intervention to correct market failures, reduce inequality, and promote social welfare. They support government regulation of industries, enforcement of labor standards, and provision of public goods to ensure fair competition and protect the public interest.
Keynesian Influence
Influenced by Keynesian economics, modern liberals support government spending and monetary policies to stabilize the economy, particularly during downturns. They believe the state must manage the economy to prevent crises and ensure full employment.
The Welfare State and Social Justice
Support for Welfare State
infoNote
Modern liberals view the welfare state as essential for promoting social justice and reducing economic inequality. They believe the government must provide basic services such as healthcare, education, and unemployment benefits to ensure all citizens have opportunities to succeed.
The welfare state protects individuals from the insecurities of the free market, ensuring that economic growth benefits all members of society, not just the wealthy.
Taxation and Redistribution
infoNote
Modern liberals advocate for progressive taxation to fund the welfare state and redistribute wealth to reduce economic inequality. They believe those with higher incomes should contribute more to society, ensuring everyone has access to essential services and opportunities.
Redistribution through taxation is seen as a way to create a fairer society with more evenly distributed wealth, where the government actively levels the playing field for all citizens.
Regulating Capitalism
infoNote
While supporting capitalism, modern liberals argue it must be regulated to prevent exploitation, protect the environment, and ensure sustainable and inclusive economic growth.
They believe unchecked capitalism can lead to significant social and economic inequalities, environmental degradation, and market failures. Therefore, they support government regulations that protect consumers, workers, and the public good.
Modern Liberalism Solutions to Unemployment
Keynesian Recommendations
infoNote
During high unemployment, Keynes recommended that governments should 'reflate' their economies by increasing public spending or cutting taxes. He argued that unemployment could only be solved through government intervention, not the invisible hand of capitalism.
Keynesian demand management promised government ability to manipulate employment and growth levels to secure general prosperity. Unregulated capitalism, according to Keynes, tends to bring low investment, short-termism, and social fragmentation.
Social Liberalism
Growth of State Intervention
The 20th century saw the growth of state intervention in western states, taking the form of social welfare efforts to support citizens by addressing poverty, disease, and ignorance. Governments aimed for national efficiency, healthier workforces, and stronger armies, and faced electoral pressure for social reform from newly enfranchised industrial workers.
Contrast with Classical Liberalism
Modern liberals defend social welfare based on equality of opportunity, contrasting with classical liberals who extol self-help and individual responsibility. They argue that the state has a social responsibility to reduce disadvantages and create equal life chances.
Beveridge Report (1942)
The Beveridge Report aimed to tackle the 'five giants': want, disease, ignorance, squalor, and idleness, promising protection from 'cradle to grave'.
Social-Democratic Liberalism
Social liberalism evolved into social-democratic liberalism, characterized by support for relative social equality and the idea of 'equality as fairness'. John Rawls argued that an egalitarian society is fairer than an inegalitarian one, proposing the 'difference principle': social and economic inequalities should benefit the least well-off, recognizing the need for some inequality to provide work incentives.
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view the full note, or log in if you already have an account!
500K+ Students Use These Powerful Tools to Master Modern Liberalism: Reaction to Free-Market Capitalism and Expanded Freedom For their A-Level Exams.
Enhance your understanding with flashcards, quizzes, and exams—designed to help you grasp key concepts, reinforce learning, and master any topic with confidence!
20 flashcards
Flashcards on Modern Liberalism: Reaction to Free-Market Capitalism and Expanded Freedom
Other Revision Notes related to Modern Liberalism: Reaction to Free-Market Capitalism and Expanded Freedom you should explore
Discover More Revision Notes Related to Modern Liberalism: Reaction to Free-Market Capitalism and Expanded Freedom to Deepen Your Understanding and Improve Your Mastery
96%
114 rated
Differing views and tensions within liberalism
Classical Liberalism: Minimal State and Individual Freedom