Photo AI
Last Updated Sep 26, 2025
Revision notes with simplified explanations to understand Whistle-blowing quickly and effectively.
442+ students studying
Employees have two methods to whistle blow:
They don't want to break the law – Accountant and tax fraud
They know people are breaking the law – Ed Snowden
They want to stop the mistreatment of people – Sport Direct
They morally disagree with an action the business is taking – Animal Welfare
They may lose their jobs, and they may not be compensated for this. – Animal Welfare &Ed Snowden
No one believes the whistle-blower, so their colleagues outcast them – Animal Welfare
Your fellow workers lose their jobs because the company is shut down because of illegal practices
As an employee, you sign a contract with the employer – A contract sets out rules, regulations, responsibilities, and conditions
Whistle-blowing often leads to an individual breaking this contract
Sports Direct: A Whistle-blower reveals common practices found in sports direct to the government, this was investigated by the Business, Innovation and Skills Committee. The complaints were as follows: (https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-derbyshire-36855374)
Ed Snowden: He was a whistle-blower who sold his story to the Guardian newspaper. The complaints were as follows:
(https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/jun/09/edward-snowden-nsa-whistleblower-surveillance)
According to act utilitarianism, the morality of whistleblowing depends on the resulting consequences.
If whistleblowing leads to a greater overall happiness than remaining silent, it is considered morally right.
Conversely, if it results in less overall happiness, it is deemed morally wrong. For example, if a company generates significant positive outcomes, whistleblowing about certain negative aspects, such as exploitation, might be seen as wrong because the negative impact of whistleblowing could outweigh the positive contributions of the business.
In Kantian ethics, lying is categorically wrong because it cannot be universalized.
Consequently, Kant would oppose any form of deceit to conceal negative business practices.
Even if exposing the truth leads to the collapse of the business and the loss of jobs for innocent employees, it is always one's duty to tell the truth.
Kant's second formulation of the categorical imperative asserts that individuals should never be treated merely as means to an end.
Since most instances of whistleblowing reveal exploitative or deceptive practices that treat people as mere instruments, Kant would support whistleblowing. This support stems from his commitment to the inherent dignity and respect owed to every person, reinforcing the moral duty to expose wrongdoing.
Enhance your understanding with flashcards, quizzes, and exams—designed to help you grasp key concepts, reinforce learning, and master any topic with confidence!
170 flashcards
Flashcards on Whistle-blowing
Revise key concepts with interactive flashcards.
Try Religious Studies Flashcards18 quizzes
Quizzes on Whistle-blowing
Test your knowledge with fun and engaging quizzes.
Try Religious Studies Quizzes29 questions
Exam questions on Whistle-blowing
Boost your confidence with real exam questions.
Try Religious Studies Questions27 exams created
Exam Builder on Whistle-blowing
Create custom exams across topics for better practice!
Try Religious Studies exam builder38 papers
Past Papers on Whistle-blowing
Practice past papers to reinforce exam experience.
Try Religious Studies Past PapersDiscover More Revision Notes Related to Whistle-blowing to Deepen Your Understanding and Improve Your Mastery
Join 500,000+ A-Level students using SimpleStudy...
Join Thousands of A-Level Students Using SimpleStudy to Learn Smarter, Stay Organized, and Boost Their Grades with Confidence!
Report Improved Results
Recommend to friends
Students Supported
Questions answered